IT as an instrument for democratization of parliamentary activities: Latin American practice

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Latin America has a favorable political and legal environment for the introduction of democratic innovations in the activities of public authorities. The use of information technology is seen as one of the key elements of democratization processes. Despite the relatively low level of Internet penetration and the crisis of confidence in political institutions the parliaments of these countries have been quite consistent in opening up access to their activities to citizens. The article analyzes the practices of the e-citizenship portal of the Brazilian Senate and the Peruvian Virtual Parliament, where for a long time on a systematic and regular basis citizens take part in the lawmaking process.

作者简介

Tatiana Vasilieva

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Moscow, Russia

参考

  1. Костогрызов П.И. Латиноамериканский парламентаризм перед вызовами XXI в. // Таврические чтения - 2016. Актуальные проблемы парламентаризма: история и современность: Междунар. науч. конф., С-Петербург, Таврический дворец, 8 - 9 декабря 2016 г.: сб. науч. ст. / под ред. А.Б. Николаева. СПб., 2017. Ч. 2. С. 264.
  2. Неверов К.А. Проблемы цифровизации гражданского участия в развивающихся странах: «правительство как платформа» в странах Латинской Америки // Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС. 2021. Т. 17. № 4. С. 362.
  3. Barrantes Martínez A. M. Análisis de la participación ciudadana en el Foro Legislativo Virtual del Congreso de la República respecto de la Ley 31068 que faculta el retiro de los Fondos Privados de Pensiones en el contexto de la pandemia Covid-19. Tesi para obtener el grado academico Magister en Gerencias Social. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Lima, 2022. P. 79 // Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. URL: https://tesis.pucp.edu.pe/repositorio/handle/20.500.12404/24606 (дата обращения: 23.05.2023).
  4. Castañedo Castro C.F. Foros Legislativos Virtuales // Politicaperu. URL: https://www.poiticaperu.org/foros-legislativos-virtuales.htm (дата обращения: 23.05.2023).
  5. Citizen Participation in the Legislative Process. P. 10 // ParlAmericas. URL: https://parlamericas.org/uploads/documents/Toolkit_Citizen_Participation_in_the_Legislative_Process.pdf (дата обращения: 28.05.2023).
  6. Coutinho R.L., Farranha A.C. Portal e-Cidadania e consultas públicas: Resultados para compreender estratégias digitais nos parlamentos. VIII Jornada de Pesquisa ne Extensão. 2017 // Jornadas de Pesquisa ne Extensão da Câmara dos Deputados. URL: https://soac.camara.gov.br/index.php/Jornada/VIII/paper/viewFile/181/67 (дата обращения: 25.03.2023).
  7. Faria de C.F.S. The open parliament in the age of the internet. Can the people now collaborate with legislatures in lawmaking? Brasília, 2013. P. 133.
  8. Frick M.M. Parliaments in the Digital Age. Exploring Latin America. P. 8 // E-Democracy Center. E-working Paper. 2005. No. 1. Agora. Portal for Parliamentary Development. URL: https://www.agora-parl.org/resources/library/parliaments-digital-age-exploring-latin-america (дата обращения: 28.05.2023).
  9. Global Parliamentary Report 2022. Public engagement in the work of parliament. Annex: Case studies and practical guides. P. 7 // Inter-Parliamentary Union. URL: https://www.ipu.org/impact/democracy-and-strong-parliaments/global-parliamentary-report/global-parliamentary-report-2022-public-engagement-in-work-parliament (дата обращения: 24.05.2023).
  10. Gómes R.M. El Procedimiento legislativo en Perú: un ejemplo de procedimiento deliberativo. Aspectos relativos a la participación ciudadana // Revista de las Cortes Generales. 2012. Num. 85. P. 227, 228.
  11. Good Practices on Transparency and Citizen Participation in the Legislatures of the Americas. Santiago, 2017. P. 54–56, 63, 64.
  12. Kies R., Méndez F., Schmitter P.C., Treschel A.H. Evaluation Use of New Technologies in Order to Facilitate Democracy in Europe. E-democratizing the Parliaments and Parties of Europe. Working Paper. Brussels, 2003. P. 5, 6 // European Parliament. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2003/471583/IPOL-JOIN_ET(2003)471583_EN.pdf (дата обращения: 24.05.2023).
  13. Kingham T. e-Parliaments. The Use of Information and Communication Technologies to Improve Parliamentary Processes // World Bank Institute Working Paper. 2003. No. 28641. P. 30, 32. URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/866001468778800783/e-Parliaments-the-use-of-information-and-communication-technologies-to-improve-parliamentary-processes (дата обращения: 11.05.2023).
  14. Latinobarómetro. Opinión Pública Latinoamericana. Informe 1995 - 2015. Santiago de Chile. P. 105, 106 // Latinobarómetro. Informes Anuales. URL: https://www.latinobarometro.org/latContents.jsp (дата обращения: 12.05.2023).
  15. Leston-Bandeira C. Seven reasons why parliaments struggle with digital // AGORA-parl.org. URL: http://old.agora-parl.org/interact/blog/seven-reasons-why-parliaments-struggle-digital (дата обращения: 28.05.2023).
  16. Mitozo I.B. Institutional Dynamics and the Development of E-Participation Tools in Brazil and the UK // E-legis. 2021. Vol. 14. No. 36. P. 12.
  17. Negretto G., Couso J. Constitution-Building Processes in Latin America // International IDEA Discussion Paper. 2018. No. 3. P. 39, 41.
  18. Pogrebinschi T. Innovating Democracy? The Means and Ends of Citizen Participation in Latin America. Cambridge, 2023. P. 13, 21, 25, 30, 33, 34, 39.
  19. Pogrebinsci T. Latin America: democracy beyond representation. P. 1 // Latinno. URL: https: //www.latinno.net/media/publications/Latin_America-Democracy_beyond_Representation.pdf (дата обращения: 14.05.2023).
  20. Pogrebinschi T. The Pragmatic Turn of Democracy in Latin America. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Study. 2013. August // Latinno. Innovations for Democracy in Latin America. URL: https://latinno.net/media/publications/Article_1_-_English.pdf (дата обращения: 24.01.2023).
  21. Pogrebinschi T. Thirty Years of Democratic Innovations in Latin America. Berlin: WZB Berlin Social Science Center, 2021. P. 12 // EconStor. URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/235143/1/Full-text-report-Pogrebinschi-Thirty-years-of.pdf (дата обращения: 24.05.2023).
  22. Santos de M.B.P., Segurado R., Malina P. Citizens and Public contestation; Broadening the limits of political participation in Brazil // E-legis. 2019. No. 29. P. 146, 149.
  23. Welp Y. Bridging the Political Gap? The Adoption of ICTs for the Improvement of Latin American Parliamentary Democracy // E-Parliament and ICT-Based Legislation: Concept, Experiences and Lessons / ed. by M.Z. Sobaci. Hershey PA, 2011. P. 226.
  24. Welp Y. Democracy and Digital Divide in Latin America // E-Democracy Center. E-working Paper. 2007. No. 1. P. 6, 7, 11, 13.
  25. Welp Y. Democratic Innovations in Latin America: The culture of citizen participation. P. 23 // Academia.edu. URL: https://www.academia.edu/25010693/Democratic_innovation_in_Latin_America_The_culture_of_citizen_participation (дата обращения: 21.01.2023).
  26. Zazzali J.C. Los hitos en la legisldción ambiental del Perú. El papel del Congreso dela República y la influencia de la sociedad civil. Seminario Transparencia y Responsabilidada Ambiental en el Congreso de Chile. Proecto BID-PUC, Santiago de Chile. 9 Septiembre 2013. URL: https://politicaspublicas.uc.cl/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/jorge-caillaux-los-hitos-en-la-legislacion-ambiental-del-peru.pdf (дата обращения: 23.05.2023).

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023