Experimental data and analysis of some peculiarities of the reaction kinetics of ethyl acetate synthesis at 323.15 K

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The results of experimental investigation of the kinetics of the esterification reaction in the system acetic acid – ethanol – ethyl acetate – water at 323.15 K for reaction (stoichiometric) lines in different concentration regions are presented. The peculiarities of the appearance of different kinetic curves, the influence of relative amounts of acid and alcohol on the reaction rate have been considered. On the basis of the obtained data, the kinetic equations and the possibility of their application to describe the reaction under consideration have been analyzed.

About the authors

G. H. Misikov

St. Petersburg State University

198504, St. Petersburg, Russia

A. A. Samarov

St. Petersburg State University

198504, St. Petersburg, Russia

M. A. Trofimova

St. Petersburg State University

198504, St. Petersburg, Russia

A. M. Toikka

St. Petersburg State University

Email: a.toikka@spbu.ru
198504, St. Petersburg, Russia

References

  1. Kabilan M., Paul P., Duraipandiyan V., Muthupandi M.J. // Nat. Pestic. Res. 2024. V. 10. 100090. doi: 10.1016/j.napere.2024.100090.
  2. Marino D.J. Ethyl Acetate. Encyclopedia of Toxicology. 2nd Edition / Chief Editor: Philip Wexler: Elsevier. 2005. P. 277–279. doi: 10.1016/B0-12-369400-0/00390-2.
  3. Li X., Wang M., Chu Y. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2024. V. 487. 150588. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.150588.
  4. Supang W., Ngamprasertsith S., Sakdasri W., Sawangkeaw R. // J. Supercrit. Fluids. 2022. V. 186. 105586. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2022.105586.
  5. Malaika A., Ptaszyńska K., Morawa Eblagon K. et al. // Fuel. 2021. V. 304. Article 121381. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121381.
  6. Jayant K., Gupta C., Seethamraju S., Mahajani S.M. // Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024. V. 331. 125650. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125650.
  7. Ersingün D., Aldemir A. // Desalin. Water Treat. 2024. V. 317. 100117. doi: 10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100117.
  8. Chen Y., Zhang Q., Liu K. et al. // Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023. V. 171. P. 607. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2023.01.057.
  9. Wang Z., Zhang Y., Zhang Z. et al. // Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2023. V. 53. P. 63. doi: 10.1016/j.cjche.2022.02.012.
  10. Zhu M.H.., Feng Z.J.., Hua X.M. et al. // Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016. V. 233. P. 171. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.01.038.
  11. Dawameh F., Elmutasim O., Gaber D. et al. // Mol. Catal. 2021. V. 501. Article 111371. doi: 10.1016/j.mcat.2020.111371.
  12. Merchant S.Q., Almohammad K.A., Al Bassam A.A., Ali S.H. // Fuel. 2013. V. 111. P. 140. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.04.016.
  13. Finger P.H., Osmari T.A., Costa J.M.C. et al. // Appl. Catal. A. 2020. V. 589. 117236. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2019.117236.
  14. Guliani D., Sobti A., Pal Toor A. // Mater. Today. Proc. 2021. V. 41. № 4. P. 805. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.751.
  15. Xu D., Ma H., Cheng F. // Mater. Res. Bull. 2014. V. 53. P. 15. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.01.029.
  16. He R., Dong Y., Muhammad Y. et al. // Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2018. V. 137. P. 235. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2018.07.020.
  17. Itoh N., Ishida J., Sato T., Hasegawa. Y. // Catal. Today. 2016. V. 268. P. 79. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.02.027.
  18. Liu Q., Shi J., Wang T. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2021. V. 6. 100088. doi: 10.1016/j.ceja.2021.100088.
  19. Lin Y.K., Nguyen V.H., Yu J.C.C. et al. // J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2017. V. 79. P. 23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2017.06.031.
  20. Meng D., Dai Y., Xu Y. // Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2020. V. 140. P. 14. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.039
  21. Singh D., Gupta R.K., Kumar V. // Comput. Chem. Eng. 2015. V. 73. P. 70. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2014.11.007.
  22. Cheng H., Zhong J.1, Dai Y. et al. // J. Cleaner Product. 2023. V. 421. 138565. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138565
  23. Fernandez M.F., Barroso B., Meyer, X.M. // Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 2012. V. 30. P. 787. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-59520-1.50016-6
  24. Brandt S., Horstmann S., Steinigeweg S., Gmehling J. // Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2014. V. 376. P. 48. doi: 10.1016/j.fluid.2014.05.031
  25. Chilev Ch., Simeonov E. // J. Chem. Techn. Metal. 2017. V. 52. Issue 3. P. 463.
  26. Arora S., Srivastava P. // Int. J. Sci. Res. 2014. V. 3. Issue 12. P. 2571.
  27. Ascani M., Sadowski G., Held Ch. // Molecules. 2023. V. 28. 1768. doi: 10.3390/molecules28041768
  28. Toikka M., Samarov A., Trofimova M. et al. // Fluid Phase Equilib. 2014. V. 373. P. 72. doi: 10.1016/j.fluid.2014.04.013
  29. Trofimova M., Sadaev A., Samarov A. et al. // Ibid. 2020. V. 503. 112321. doi: 10.1016/j.fluid.2019.112321.
  30. Trofimova M., Toikka M., Toikka A. // Ibid. 2012. V. 313. P. 46. doi: 10.1016/j.fluid.2011.09.035.
  31. Trofimova M., Samarov A., Misikov G., Zaripova S. // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2024. V. 94. P. S165. doi: 10.1134/S1070363224140172.
  32. Golikova A., Samarov A., Trofimova M. et al. // J. Solution Chem. 2017. V. 46. P. 374. doi: 10.1007/s10953-017-0583-1.
  33. Toikka A.M., Trofimova M.A., Toikka M.A. // Russ. Chem. Bull. 2012. V. 61. № 3. P. 662. doi: 10.1007/s11172-012-0097-3.
  34. Misikov G., Trofimova M., Prikhodko I. // Chemistry. 2023. V. 5. № 4. P. 2542. doi: 10.3390/chemistry5040165.
  35. Misikov G.K., Toikka M.A., Toikka A.M. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 2024. V. 98. P. 1981. doi: 10.1134/S0036024424701115.
  36. Toikka A.M., Misikov G. Kh., Volodina N.Y. et al. // Ibid. 2024. V. 98. P. 1478. doi: 10.1134/S003602442470047X.
  37. Kondepudi D., Prigogine I. Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures. Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom: ‎John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2015. 523 p.
  38. Prigogine I., Defay R. Chemical Thermodynamics. Harlow, UK: Longmans, Green and Co., 1954. 533 p.
  39. Первухин О.К. // Журн. физ. химии. 1989. Т. 63. № 8. С. 2067.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences