20 Years of Poland's Membership in the EU: Successes and Challenges

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article analyses twenty years of Poland's membership in the European Union and its impact on the country's socio-economic development. Poland's accession to the EU was a turning point that initiated a profound institutional and economic transformation that contributed to GDP growth, infrastructure modernisation, economic convergence and improved living standards. Poland transitioned from a peripheral economy to one of the most dynamic members of the EU, which allowed it to strengthen its position in the international arena. However, the integration process was accompanied by a number of challenges, such as dependence on external capital, weakness of national institutions, imbalance between formal and informal practices and insufficient support for national entrepreneurial initiatives. The formation of a hybrid model of capitalism, combining elements of Western European systems and institutions inherited from the socialist past, have determined Poland's unique development trajectory. The paper pays special attention to the critical assessment of the consequences of integration, including the disparities in the distribution of benefits between Poland and the old EU members. The author concludes that, despite impressive achievements, the Polish economic model remains vulnerable to internal and external challenges, which requires its rethinking – first of all, the transition from an exogenous growth model to a strategy based on internal sources of development in an increasingly complex global context.

About the authors

A. A Habarta

Institute of Europe, RAS

Email: a.habarta@inno.mgimo.ru
Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Leading Researcher of the Centre for Iberic studies of the Department of country studies Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Габарта А.А. (2018) Концепции «разнообразия капитализма» на примере Польши. Современная Европа. № 7. С. 141–151.
  2. Habarta А.А. (2018) Koncepcii “raznoobraziya kapitalizma” na primere Pol'shi [Concepts of “Variety of Capitalism” (Polish case)], Sovremennaya Evropa, 7, pp. 141–151. (In Russian).
  3. Куликова Н.В. (отв. ред.) (2017) Постсоциалистический мир: итоги трансформации. Т. 1. Центрально-Восточная Европа. Алетейя, Санкт-Петербург. 428 с.
  4. Kulikova N.V. (ed.) (2017) Postsocialisticheskij mir: itogi transformacii [The post-socialist world: transformation results]. Vol. 1. Central and Eastern Europe. Aletheia Publishing House, St. Petersburg, Russia. (In Russian).
  5. Глинкина С.П., Куликова Н. В. (2018) О модели капитализма в Центрально-Восточной Европе. Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. № 3. С. 9–24.
  6. Glinkina S.P., Kulikova N.V. (2018) O modeli kapitalizma v Central'no-Vostochnoj Evrope [On the model of capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe], Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 3, pp. 9–24. (In Russian).
  7. Дрыночкин А.В. (2024) Насколько выгодно странам ЦВЕ членство в ЕС: попытка критического анализа. Современная Европа. № 3. С. 125‒137.
  8. Drynochkin A.V. (2024) Naskol'ko vygodno stranam CVE chlenstvo v ES: popytka kriticheskogo analiza [How Beneficial is EU Membership for CEE Countries: an Attempt of Critical Analysis], Sovremennaya Evropa, 3, pp. 125‒137. (In Russian).
  9. Кондратьева Н.Б. (2023) Сближение благосостояния стран ЕС в условиях интеграции: проверка гипотезы. Современная Европа. № 7. С. 127‒138.
  10. Kondratieva N.B. (2023) Sblizhenie blagosostoyaniya stran ES v usloviyah integracii: proverka gipotezy [Convergence of the Welfare of EU Countries in the Context of Integration: Hypothesis Testing], Sovremennaya Evropa, 7, pp. 127‒138. (In Russian).
  11. Лобанов М.М., Глинкина С.П. (2020) Разновидности капиталистических отношений в зарубежных странах с формирующимися рынками: проблемы типологизации и методологии исследования. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Экономика. Т. 36. Вып. 1. С. 7–26.
  12. Lobanov M.M., Glinkina S.P. (2020) Raznovidnosti kapitalisticheskih otnoshenij v zarubezhnyh stranah s formiruyushchimisya rynkami: problemy tipologizacii i metodologii issledovaniya [Varieties of capitalist relations in foreign emerging market countries: The problems of typology and research methodology], St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, 36(1), pp. 7–26. (In Russian).
  13. Синицина И.С. (2020) Социальные стимулы и барьеры участия в европейской интеграции (на примере стран-новых членов ЕС). Общество и экономика. № 8. С. 5–26.
  14. Sinitsina I.S. (2020) Social'nye stimuly i bar'ery uchastiya v evropejskoj integracii (na primere stran-novyh chlenov ES) [Social stimuli and barriers of joining the European integration (the case of Central and South Eastern European countries)], Society and Economics, 8, pp. 5–26. (In Russian).
  15. Синицина И.С., Чудакова Н.А. (2019) Польша: Новая экономическая политика. Актуальные проблемы Европы. № 3. С. 141–168.
  16. Sinitsina I.S., Chudakova N.A. (2019) Pol'sha: Novaya ekonomicheskaya politika [Poland: New economic policy], Current problems of Europe, 8, pp. 5–26. (In Russian).
  17. Тураева М.О., Вардомский Л.Б. (отв. ред.) (2020) Трансформация моделей экономики в странах постсоциалистического мира. ИЭ РАН, Москва. 192 с.
  18. Turaeva M.O., Vardomsky L.B. (ed.) (2020) Transformaciya modelej ekonomiki v stranah postsocialisticheskogo mira [Transformation of market economy patterns in the post-socialist world], Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
  19. Четверикова А.С. (2021) Вишеградская «четвёрка» в периоды кризисов. Современная Европа. № 4. С. 37‒46.
  20. Chetverikova A.S. (2021) Vishegradskaya “chetvyorka” v periody krizisov [The Visegrad Four in Times of Crisis], Sovremennaya Evropa, 4, pp. 37‒46. (In Russian).
  21. Gardawski J., Rapacki R. (2021) Patchwork Capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe – A New Conceptualization. Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology. No. 12(24). P. 7–104.
  22. Gil S., Llorca R., Martinez-Serrano J.A. (2008) Assessing the Enlargement and Deepening of the European Union. The World Economy. Vol. 31. No. 9. P. 1253–1272.
  23. Mion G., Ponattu D. (2019) Estimating economic benefits of the Single Market for European countries and regions. Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh, Germany. 31 p.
  24. Nowak-Far A. (2024) Integracja Polski z Unią Europejską Perspektywa gospodarcza, regulacyjna i polityczna. Gazeta SGH. No. 2(379). URL: https://gazeta.sgh.waw.pl/meritum/integracja-polski-z-unia-europejska-perspektywa-gospodarcza-regulacyjna-i-polityczna (дата обращения: 01.02.2025).
  25. Piketty T. (2020) Capital and Ideology. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, USA. 1068 p.
  26. Rapacki R. (ed.) (2019) Diversity of patchwork capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe. Routledge. 239 p.
  27. Żurawski W. (2023) Zbadali bilans członkostwa Polski w Unii Europejskiej. Oto, co się okazało. wnp.pl – portal gospodarczy. 14.10. URL: https://www.wnp.pl/finanse/zbadali-bilans-czlonkostwapolskiw-unii-europejskiej-oto-co-sie-okazalo,762957.html (дата обращения: 01.02.2025).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences