Free Movement in the EU: Harmonisation of Mobile Citizens’ Social Rights

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The author focuses on the current stagnation in negotiating process on the further improvement of supranational regulation on coordination of social security systems in the European Union. The article examines the basic principles of the free movement of workers in the EU and notes that the 2004/2007 EU enlargement has had a significant impact on the scale and direction of labour mobility within the Community. The analysis of the main indicators and characteristics of workers' mobility reveals the existing disparities between the Member States. The author points out that the divergence of national social security regimes, as well as diverging interests of individual EU Member States, such as protecting the rights of their own mobile citizens, or combating “social dumping”, play a key role in hindering the harmonization of social security rules in the context of freedom of movement. The concept of “failing forward” used for the study allowed to comprehend how social integration can be promoted when challenged by contradictions. The need to comply with the rules of the common internal market, on the one hand, and the interests of individual EU member states and their citizens, on the other, in a situation where the current legislation does not meet the challenges of the time, and the development of new legislation is constantly blocked, leads the EU institutions to intensify intergovernmental cooperation and resort to complementary mechanisms. The author concludes that the use of nonbinding regulatory instruments such as electronic data exchange serves as an intermediate link in the process of deepening integration in the area and may become an impetus for restarting negotiations and help finalise the text of the new legislation.

About the authors

L. S Bisson

Institute of Europe RAS

Email: lyubov.pasyakina@gmail.com
Candidate of Sciences (Politics), Senior research fellow, Center for European integration studies Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Ананьева Е.В., Биссон Л.С., Потемкина О.Ю. (2016) Социальные последствия свободы передвижения граждан в Европейском союзе. Социальное развитие Европы: проблемы и перспективы. ИЕ РАН, Москва. С. 119‒139.
  2. Ananieva Е.V., Bisson L.S., Potemkina О.Yu. (2016) Social'nye posledstviya svobody peredvizheniya grazhdan v Evropejskom soyuze [The Social Consequences of the Freedom of Movement of Citizens ft he European Union]. In Social'noe razvitie Evropy: problemy i perspektivy [European Social Development: Problems and Perspectives]. IE RAN, Moscow, Russia, pp. 119‒139. (In Russian).
  3. Бабынина Л.О. (2020) Деевропеизация или демонтаж: как будут строиться отношения ЕС и Великобритании. Современная Европа. № 3(96). С. 5‒15. doi: 10.15211/soveurope320200515.
  4. Babynina L.O. (2020) Deevropeizaciya ili demontazh: kak budut stroit'sya otnosheniya ES i Velikobritanii [De-Europeanization or Dismantling: Prospects of the EU‒UK Relations], Sovremennaya Evropa, 3(96), pp. 5‒15. doi: 10.15211/soveurope320200515. (In Russian).
  5. Бабынина Л.О. (2023) Модели взаимодействия ЕС со странами-партнерами: опыт Швейцарии. Современная Европа. № 7. С. 21‒34. doi: 10.31857/S0201708323070021.
  6. Babynina L.O. (2023) Modeli vzaimodejstviya ES so stranami-partnerami: opyt SHvejcarii [The Model of Interaction of the European Union with Partner Countries: Swiss Experience], Sovremennaya Evropa, 7, pp. 21‒34. doi: 10.31857/S0201708323070021 (In Russian).
  7. Биссон Л.С. (2018) Свобода передвижения трудящихся в ЕС: сложный путь к компромиссу. Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН. № 1. С. 130‒134.
  8. Bisson L.S. (2018) Svoboda peredvizheniya trudyashchihsya v ES: slozhnyj put’ k kompromissu [Free movement of workers in the EU: hard way to reach a compromise], Nauchnoanaliticheskij vestnik IE RAN, 1, pp. 130‒134. (In Russian).
  9. Биссон Л.С., Потемкина О.Ю. (2014) Свобода передвижения граждан в Европейском союзе ‒ достижение или проблема? Актуальные проблемы Европы. № 4. С. 12‒29.
  10. Bisson L.S., Potemkina О.Yu. (2014) Svoboda peredvizheniya grazhdan v Evropejskom soyuze ‒ dostizhenie ili problema? [Freedom of movement of citizens in the European Union ‒ an achievement or a problem?], Aktual'nye problemy Evropy, 4, pp. 12‒29. (In Russian).
  11. Борко Ю.А., Биссон Л.С. (2019) Европейская интеграция: перезапуск идеи «Социальной Европы». Современная Европа. № 6 (92). С. 5‒17.
  12. Bisson L.S., Borko Yu.A. (2019) Evropejskaya integraciya: perezapusk idei «Social'noj Evropy» [European Integration: A Restart of the Idea of “Social Europe”], Sovremennaya Evropa, 6(92), pp. 5‒18. doi: 10.15211/soveurope620190517. (In Russian).
  13. Кондратьева Н.Б. (2020) Тенденции трудовой мобильности в ЕС. Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН. № 4(16). С. 58‒63. doi: 10.15211/vestnikieran420205863.
  14. Kondratyeva N.B. (2020) Tendencii trudovoj mobil'nosti v ES [Trends in Intra-EU Labour Mobility]. Nauchno-analiticheskij vestnik IE RAN, 4, pp. 58‒63. doi: 10.15211/vestnikieran420205863 (In Russian).
  15. Потемкина О.Ю. (2023) «Падение вверх»: реформы свободы передвижения в ЕС в период кризисов. Современная Европа. № 1(115). С. 8‒20. doi: 10.31857/S0201708323010011.
  16. Potemkina О.Yu. (2023) «Padenie vverh»: reformy svobody peredvizheniya v ES v period krizisov [«Failing Forward»: Freedom of Movement Reforms in the European Union During Crises], Sovremennaya Evropa, 1(115), pp. 8‒20. doi: 10.31857/S0201708323010011 (In Russian).
  17. Abels J. (2025) Failing Forward in European Economic Governance: The Cyclicality of European Integration and Institutional Competition in the COVID-19 Crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 63. Issue 2. P. 467–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13588.
  18. Black R. et al (2010), Engbersen G., Okólski M., Panţîru, C. (Eds.). (2010). A Continent Moving West? EU Enlargement and Labour Migration from Central and Eastern Europe. Amsterdam University Press. 344 p.
  19. Conant L. (2021) Failing backward? EU citizenship, the Court of Justice, and Brexit. Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 28. No. 10. P. 1592‒1610. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1954061
  20. Farkas B., Máté A., Rácz T. (2022). A contested foundation of European integration: The free movement of labour. Society and Economy. Vol. 44. Issue 3. P. 310‒336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2022.00015
  21. Favell A., Recchi E. (eds) (2009) Pioneers of European Integration: Citizenship and Mobility in the EU. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK. 312 p.
  22. Golynker O. (2020). EU coordination of social security from the point of view of EU integration theory. European Journal of Social Security. No. 22. P. 110‒137. doi: 10.1177/1388262720938154
  23. Grabbe Ch. (2023). Free movement and access to social security in the EU: The challenge of exporting unemployment benefits. European Journal of Social Security. 25. 10.1177/13882627231161926
  24. Jones, E., Kelemen, R. D., Meunier, S. (2015). Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration. Comparative Political Studies, 49(7), 1010-1034. doi: 10.1177/0010414015617966
  25. Jones E., Kelemen R.D., Meunier S. (2021) Failing forward? Crises and patterns of European integration. Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 28. No. 10. P. 1519‒1536. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1954068
  26. Mantu S. (2021) Schengen, Free Movement and Crises: Links, Effects and Challenges. European Journal of Migration and Law. No. 23(4). P. 377‒384.
  27. Österman M., Palme J., Ruhs M. (2024) Free movement versus European welfare states?: variations of the fiscal effects of EU migrants across welfare state regimes. Politics & society. Vol. 52. No. 3. P. 376‒408.
  28. Ruhs M. (2017), Free Movement in the European Union: National Institutions vs Common Policies? International Migration. Vol. 55. Issue S1. P. 22‒38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12398
  29. Ruhs M., Palme J. (2018). Institutional contexts of political conflicts around free movement in the European Union: a theoretical analysis. Journal of European Public Policy. No. 25(10). P. 481–1500.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences