System of criminal measures procedural coercion: What signs indicate for its existence?

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article attempts to consider the entire set of currently existing measures of criminal procedural coercion from the point of view of systems theory, that is, through comparison with the known signs of systematicity: unity, integrity, interconnection of elements, structure and orderliness, hierarchical structure, multiplicity of descriptions, dynamic development. It is noted that the totality of coercive measures provided for criminal justice meets only two of the specified characteristics. At the same time, circumstances are analyzed that prevent the identification of other signs of systematicity in a given set. As a result, the conclusion is formulated that the system of measures of criminal procedural coercion is another, in no way substantiated and unsubstantiated doctrinal myth, which owes its emergence to incorrect legal and technical approaches that imply a desire to group the provisions of the law, regardless of the essence, content and legal the nature of the relevant techniques and procedures.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Sergey B. Rossinskiy

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: s.rossinskiy@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3862-3188

Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Chief Researcher of the Sector of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminology

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Blauberg I. V. The problem of integrity and a systematic approach. M., 1997. Pp. 249–258 (in Russ.).
  2. Bulatov B. B. State coercion in criminal proceedings. Omsk, 2003. Pp. 42, 43 (in Russ.).
  3. Vershinina S. I. The regulatory and legal essence of criminal procedural coercion. M., 2017. P. 127 (in Russ.).
  4. Volkova V. N., Denisov A. A. Systems theory and systems analysis. M., 2014. Pp. 43–46 (in Russ.).
  5. Garayeva T. B. Obligation to appear in criminal proceedings: essence, grounds and features of application // Scientific bulletin of the Omsk academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2021. No. 2 (81). P. 106 (in Russ.).
  6. Gvishiani D. M. Selected works on philosophy, sociology and system analysis / ed. by Yu. S. Popkov, V. N. Sadovskiy, A. A. Seitov. M., 2007. P. 245 (in Russ.).
  7. Davletov A. A., Polityko O. E. The problem of the exclusivi-ty of applying a preventive measure to a suspect // Russian Justice. 2018. No. 6. P. 52 (in Russ.).
  8. Darovskikh S. M., Darovskikh O. I. System of coercive measures in criminal proceedings in Russia // Herald of the Ufa legal institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2018. No. 1. Pp. 62, 63 (in Russ.).
  9. Iseev D. R. The system of coercive measures and the procedure for their application in criminal proceedings in Russia: abstract … PhD in Law. Ufa, 2009. P. 6 (in Russ.).
  10. Kalacheva A. V. System of investigative bodies of the Russian Federation // Legal education and science. 2024. No. 1. Pp. 39–43 (in Russ.).
  11. Kopylova O. P. Coercive measures in criminal proceedings. Tambov, 2011. P. 13 (in Russ.).
  12. Kornukov V. M. Measures of procedural coercion in criminal proceedings. Saratov, 1978. P. 20 (in Russ.).
  13. Course in criminal procedure / ed. by L. V. Golovko. M., 2016. Pp. 521, 522 (in Russ.).
  14. Mesarovich M., Takahara Y. General theory of systems: mathematical foundations / transl. from English E. L. Nappelbaum; ed. by S. V. Emelyanova. M., 1978. Pp. 9–11(in Russ.).
  15. Milikova A. V. System of criminal procedural acts of preliminary investigation bodies // Eurasian legal journal. 2019. No. 7 (134). Pp. 302, 303 (in Russ.).
  16. Muravyov K. V. Is the regulation of the system of procedural coercive measures in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation optimal? // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2018. No. 5. Pp. 24–29 (in Russ.).
  17. Pavlov S. N. Systems theory and system analysis. Tomsk, 2003. Pp. 7–13 (in Russ.).
  18. Rossinskiy S. B. Monetary recovery as a measure of criminal procedural coercion: “Pros” and “Cons” // Criminal procedural law: concept, content, sources: materials of the Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the birth of Professor D. S. Karev. M., 2006. Pp. 214, 215 (in Russ.).
  19. Rossinskiy S. B. Pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case: the essence and methods of collecting evidence. M., 2021. P. 129 (in Russ.).
  20. Rossinskiy S. B. Detention of a suspect: a constitutional-intersectoral approach. M., 2019. P. 175 (in Russ.).
  21. Rossinskiy S. B. Purposes and grounds for detaining a suspect: what are the reasons for the existing contradictions? // Herald of the Siberian law institute of the Mi-nistry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2023. No. 3 (52). P. 36 (in Russ.).
  22. Rossinskiy S. B. Legal conditions for the application of measures of criminal procedural restraint lead to haste and unfounded accusations // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2018. No. 5. P. 15 (in Russ.).
  23. Sadovsky V. N. System // The New Philosophical Encyclopedia: in 4 vols. / ed. by M. S. Kovalev, E. I. Lakirev, L. V. Litvinov et al. M., 2010. Vol. 3. Pp. 552, 553 (in Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences