The philosophy of criminal law to be

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The actualization of the stated issue is due to the widespread dissemination and recognition of judgments about the uselessness of philosophy for branch juris-prudence. The rooting of such reflections in criminal law has led to the need to verify their validity and the reasons for their appearance. The subject of clarification also be-came the consequences for science and practice as a result of the rejection of philosophy. According to the results of the study, it was revealed that the denial of philosophy is not associated with abstraction and abstraction as its inherent properties. Distancing oneself from it is a sure sign of the pathology of criminal law thought itself, based on the principles of positivism. Philosophy is often used by science to cover its own abstraction from reality and to conceal the presence of this anomaly in its ranks. The detachment from philosophy actually hides one of the forms of the departure of jurisprudence from reality and from man as its creator.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Sergey A. Bochkarev

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: bo4karvs@yandex.ru

Doctor of Law, Chief Researcher, Institute of State and Law

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Welker K. The latest foundations of law, state and punishment. Hessen, 1813. P. 8 (in Russ.).
  2. Golik Yu. V. Is philosophy necessary for Criminal Law // Legal orbit. 2021. No. 1. P. 251 (in Russ.).
  3. Golik Yu. V. Review of the official opponent // Penitentiary science. 2020. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 534 (in Russ.).
  4. Golik Yu. V. Philosophy, morality, fight against crime // Journal of Russ. law. 2021. Vol. 25. No. 12. P. 5 (in Russ.).
  5. Gorban V. S. Why the Philosophy of Law today // Theory and practice of social development. 2018. No. 12 (130). Pp. 99–103 (in Russ.).
  6. Gruzdev V. S. Realism in jurisprudence: theoretical, methodological and historical aspects: abstract … Doctor of Law. M., 2021. Pp. 4, 5 (in Russ.).
  7. Guseinov A. A. The word of the reviewer // Bochkarev S. A. Philosophy of Criminal Law: posing a question. M., 2019. P. 5 (in Russ.).
  8. Guseinov A. A., Stepin V. S., Smirnov A. V. et al. Ways of developing the Philosophy of Law in Russia // Russ. Journal of Legal Studies. 2017. Vol. 3. No. 1 (10). P. 41 (in Russ.).
  9. Dosyukova T. V. Philosophical method of the science of Criminal Law: formulation of the problem // Legal culture. 2009. No. 1 (6). Pp. 6–12 (in Russ.).
  10. Dubovik O. L. The science of Criminal Law and philosophical teachings // Proceedings of the IGP RAS. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 4. Pp. 179, 181 (in Russ.).
  11. Zhalinsky A. E. The science of modern Criminal Law // Modern Criminal Law and Criminology / res. ed. A. E. Zhalinsky. M., 2007. P. 9 (in Russ.).
  12. Isakov V. B. Review of the official opponent // Journal of Applied Research. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 63–69 (in Russ.).
  13. Kant I. Essays: in 8 vols. M., 1994. Vol. 6. P. 226 (in Russ.).
  14. Kibalnik A. G. Traditions and innovations in Criminal Law: the obvious and the incredible // Library of criminalist. 2015. No. 5 (22). Pp. 70–74 (in Russ.).
  15. Kozlikhin I. Yu. Review of the official opponent // Journal of Applied Research. 2020. No. 4–2. Pp. 84–91 (in Russ.).
  16. Lavrov P. L. Three conversations on the modern meaning of philosophy, 1860. The first conversation. What is philosophia in knowledge? // Philosophy and Sociology: selected proc.: in 2 vols. M., 1965. Vol. 1 (in Russ.).
  17. Luneev V. V. Science of the criminal cycle and criminological realities // Criminological Journal of the Baikal State University of Economics and Law. 2007. No. 1–2. Pp. 6–24 (in Russ.).
  18. Luneev V. V. Theories of law and their correlation with the realities of life // Russ. Journal of Legal Research. 2015. Vol. 2. No. 1 (2). Pp. 19–23 (in Russ.).
  19. Malinin V. B. Causal relationship in Criminal Law. SPb., 2000 (in Russ.).
  20. Naumov A. V., Fletcher D. Basic concepts of modern Criminal Law. M., 1998 (in Russ.).
  21. Panchenko P. N. Criminal Law in philosophical understanding // Herald of the Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2008. No. 1. P. 19 (in Russ.).
  22. Poznyshev S. V. The basic principles of the science of Criminal Law. The General part. 2nd ed., rev. and add. M., 1912. P. 13 (in Russ.).
  23. Rarog A. I. The possibility of burying criminal law science under the funeral march of positivism // Herald of the University of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation. 2019. No. 4 (72). P. 130 (in Russ.).
  24. Savenkov A. N. The global crisis of modernity as a subject of Philosophy of Law // State and Law. 2019. No. 4. P. 6 (in Russ.).
  25. Savenkov A. N. Preface // Bochkarev S. A. Gnoseology of Criminal Law. M., 2021. P. 10 (in Russ.).
  26. Solovyov V. S. Philosophical principles of integral knowledge // Solovyov V. S. Essays: in 2 vols. M., 1988. Vol. 2. Pp. 23, 26 (in Russ.).
  27. Heidegger M. The basic concepts of metaphysics. World-finiteness-loneliness. SPb., 2013. P. 26 (in Russ.).
  28. Khilyuta V. V. Philosophy and Criminal Law: posing a question // Law and education. 2019. No. 5. Pp. 123, 127 (in Russ.).
  29. Shershenevich G. F. Philosophy of Law. Vol. I. Theoretical part. General theory of law. M., 1910. Iss. 1. P. 3 (in Russ.).
  30. Shults V. L. Philosophical reflection of branches of law // Russ. journal of Legal Studies. 2021. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 121 (in Russ.).
  31. Einstein A. Physics and reality: collection of arts. M., 1965 (in Russ.).
  32. Bowne B. P. Metaphysics. NY; Cincinnati; Chicago, 1882. Pp. V–VI.
  33. Trummer Carl. Zur Philosophie des Rechts und insbesondere des Strafrechts. 1827.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences