Productivity and adaptive properties of different origin potato varieties in the Russia’s Far East south

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The paper presents the results of a study on the productivity of potato genotypes of different origin depending on the water availability in soil, including the hydrothermal coefficient of Selyaninov (HTC). The group of mid-season varieties was noted to have the highest productivity (710 g/plant). Waterlogging occurred during the growing period of plants (HTC ≥ 2.5), especially at the stage of tuber formation, negatively affecting productivity. High productivity was observed in the years with relatively favorable weather conditions (2019, 2021, and 2022) when the index of environmental conditions (I) was positive and ranged within +201.63 – +221.35. The average productivity of all the specimens was 950 g/plant. Very low productivity (420–670 g/plant) was observed in 2015–2018, 2020, and 2023 due to waterlogging (I = -99.52 – -269.81). Among the studied specimens, we identified the following varieties that were characterized by not only high productivity (above 900 g/plant) but also high responsiveness to changes in the environmental conditions and stability (average bi = 1.49; S2d·103 = 0.42): early-maturing varieties – Antonina, Bastion, Kolymskii, Krepysh, Matushka, Meteor, Pamyati Kulakova, Udacha, Vitesse, Red Lady, and Red Scarlett; medium-early varieties – Arktika, Briz, Zoya, Kamchatka, Lileya, Charodei, and Gala; mid-season varieties – Ocharovanie, Utro, and Favorit; medium-late and late varieties – Kazachok and Pobeda. The research allowed us to identify potato specimens with high productivity (1040-1480 g/plant), marketability (83.2–92.8%), plasticity (bi = 1.20–1.85), stability (S2d = 0,15–5,77), homeostasis (Hom = 9.51–40.62) and breeding value (Sc = 532.79–852.14) under the conditions of the south of the Russian Far East: early maturing varieties – Bastion, Kolymskii, Krepysh, and Pamyati Kulakova; medium-early varieties – Arktika and Zoya; mid-season variety Alyaska; medium-late and late varieties – Vetraz’ and Pobeda.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

I. V. Kim

FSBSI “FSC of Agricultural Biotechnology of the Far East named after A.K. Chaiki”

Author for correspondence.
Email: kimira-80@mail.ru

Grand PhD in Agricultural Sciences

Russian Federation, Timiryazevsky village, Ussuriysk, Primorsky Krai

A. G. Klykov

FSBSI “FSC of Agricultural Biotechnology of the Far East named after A.K. Chaiki”

Email: kimira-80@mail.ru

Academician of the RAS

Russian Federation, Timiryazevsky village, Ussuriysk, Primorsky Krai

D. I. Volkov

FSBSI “FSC of Agricultural Biotechnology of the Far East named after A.K. Chaiki”

Email: kimira-80@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Timiryazevsky village, Ussuriysk, Primorsky Krai

References

  1. Zhevora S.V., Anisimov B.V., Simakov E.A. i dr. Kartofel’: problemy i perspektivy // Kartofel’ i ovoshchi. 2019. № 7. S. 2–7. https://doi.org/10.25630/PAV.2019.89.92.006.
  2. Zhuchenko A.A. Ekologo-geneticheskie principy mobilizacii mirovyh geneticheskih resursov vysshih rastenij // Obrazovanie, nauka i proizvodstvo. 2014. № 2. S. 9–17.
  3. Zejruk V.N., Mal’cev S.V., Vasil’eva S.V., Byzov V.A. Sovremennye proizvodstvennye faktory, opredelyayushchie biologicheskuyu i ekonomicheskuyu effektivnost’ hraneniya kartofelya // Hranenie i pererabotka sel’hozsyr’ya. 2019. № 3. S. 20–26. https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2019.177.
  4. Kiru S.D., Rogozina E.V. Mobilizaciya, sohranenie i izuchenie geneticheskih resursov kul’tiviruemogo i dikorastushchego kartofelya // Vavilovskij zhurnal genetiki i selekcii. 2017. T. 21. № 1. S. 7–15. https://doi.org/10.18699/VJ17.219.
  5. Kiselev E.P. Sozdanie sortov kartofelya dlya energosberegayushchej shirokoryadnoj tekhnologii vozdelyvaniya kartofelya na Dal’nem Vostoke // Dal’nevost. agrar. vestn. 2018. № 3 (47). S. 25–36. https://doi.org/10.24411/1999-6837-2018-13054.
  6. Lebedeva V.A., Gadzhiev N.M., Ivanov A.V. Prodolzhitel’nost’ perioda pokoya klubnej nekotoryh sortov kartofelya i ih gibridov v usloviyah Leningradskoj oblasti // Trudy KubGAU. 2020. № 85. S. 121–124.
  7. Loginov Yu.P., Kazak A.A. Formirovanie nadzemnoj massy i urozhajnosti klubnej v zavisimosti ot soderzhaniya krahmala v semennyh klubnyah srednespelyh sortov kartofelya // Permskij agrar. vestn. 2018. № 4 (24). S. 72–76.
  8. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po podderzhaniyu i izucheniyu mirovoj kollekcii kartofelya / sost. S.D. Kiru, L.I. Kostina, E.V. Truskinov i dr. SPb., 2010. 30 s.
  9. Metodicheskoe polozhenie (rukovodstvo) po ocenke produktivnosti i stolovyh kachestv kartofelya (kulinarnyj tip) / FGBNU VNIIKH; A.E. Shabanov, B.V. Anisimov, A.I. Kiselev i dr. M., 2017. 20 s.
  10. Nettevich E.D., Morgunov A.I., Maksimenko M.I. Povyshenie effektivnosti otbora yarovoj pshenicy na stabil’nost’ urozhajnosti i kachestvo zerna // Vestnik sel’skohozyajstvennoj nauki. 1985. № 1. S. 66–73.
  11. Podgaeckij A.A., Kravchenko N.V., Sobran I.V. Srednyaya massa klubnej potomstva ot bekkrosirovaniya slozhnyh mezhvidovyh gibridov kartofelya v pervom klubnevom pokolenii // Kartofelevodstvo : mat. nauch.-praktich. konf. «Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya selekcii i semenovodstva», 9–10 iyulya 2018 g. VNIIKH. M., 2018. S. 71–78.
  12. Timoshkin O.A., Timoshkina O.Yu. Mnogoletnie travy dlya sozdaniya gazonov v usloviyah lesostepi Srednego Povolzh’ya. Kormoproizvodstvo. 2023. № 1. S. 12–15. https://doi.org/10.25685/KRM.2023.47.76.001.
  13. Hangil’din, V.V. O principah modelirovaniya sortov intensivnogo tipa // Genetika kolichestvennyh priznakov sel’skohozyajstvennyh rastenij / AN SSSR, Nauch. sovet po problemam genetiki i selekcii, Sib. otd-nie [i dr.]. M.: Nauka, 1978. S. 111–115.
  14. Chajka A.K., Klykov A.G. Prioritetnye napravleniya v razvitii agropromyshlennogo kompleksa Dal’nego Vostoka Rossii // Vestn. DVO RAN. 2016. № 2. S. 24–30.
  15. Chirko E.M. Sravnitel’naya ocenka zernovoj produktivnosti i adaptivnosti sortov prosa (Panicum Miliaceum) v usloviyah yugo-zapadnogo regiona respubliki // Vesci naciyanal’naj akademii navuk Belarusi. Seryya agarnyh navuk. 2009. № 3. S. 49–54.
  16. Shanina E.P., Klyukina E.M. Izuchenie iskhodnogo materiala kartofelya v uslovyaih Srednego Urala // Agroprodovol’stvennaya politika Rossii. 2018. № 1 (73). S. 31–34.
  17. Shanina E.P., Klyukina E.M., Stafeeva M.A. Sravnitel’nyj analiz sortov kartofelya kollekcionnogo pitomnika v zavisimosti ot geograficheskogo proiskhozhdeniya // Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK. 2020. T. 30. № 6. S. 75–78. https://doi.org/10.24411/0235-2451-2020-10614.
  18. Yur’eva N.O., Voronkova E.V., Tereshonok D.V. i dr. Vvedenie v asepticheskuyu kul’turu digaploidov kartofelya s ispol’zovaniem adventivnyh pobegov i himioterapii // Zashchita kartofelya. 2017. № 2. S. 23–27.
  19. Yashina I.M. Znachenie sorta v sovremennyh tekhnologiyah proizvodstva kartofelya / Mat. nauch.-prakt. konf. “Kartofel’-2010”. “Aktual’nye problemy sovremennoj industrii proizvodstva kartofelya”. Cheboksary, 2010. S. 41–44.
  20. Eberhart S.A. Yield stability of single-cross genotypes // Proc. of the 24th Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Research Conf., Chicago, IL, 9–11. Dec. / J.I. Sutherland, R.J. Falasca (Eds.). Chicago, 1969. P. 22–35.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Hydrothermal coefficient and potato productivity, 2013–2023.

Download (102KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.