Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Based on a comparison of the guidelines in the Strategies for Technological Development of the Country from 2016 to 2024, a contradiction has been formed in the basic attitudes towards the personnel training system. The authors aim is to present a sociological analysis of the current situation and the existing opportunities for implementing the task of ensuring the technological sovereignty of the country with qualified personnel. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study is built on an appeal to classical works representing society: as a system of T. Parsons, E. Giddens, self-organizing system of N. Luhmann; works covering the issues of the influence of scientific and technological potential on the level of competitiveness; state programs and regulatory documents, as well as statistical and analytical materials. Results. Generalization of data on training programs in secondary vocational education, as well as implemented federal programs for its support allowed us to conclude that at the moment the situation is characterized by a gradual improvement, but the number of graduates is insufficient for the growing needs of production. The reasons are both poor training in natural cycle disciplines in schools and, accordingly, a shortage of teaching staff to solve this problem, and the consequences of the demographic pit of the 90s, which led to a reduction in potential students. The authors believe that the solution to the problem of providing qualified personnel is not so much in the constant increase in the number of graduates, but in the revision of both their training programs and the technologies of the production itself in order to replace the stages of operations that can be performed by unskilled specialists with technological developments based on artificial intelligence. The implementation of an integrated approach should be ensured by revising the training programs in universities and institutes, as well as attracting talented developers to the problem of improving production.
technological sovereignty, personnel training, secondary vocational education, universities, artificial intelligence, labor market
1. Andreeva, O.V. (2014). Texnologicheskij i finansovy`j suverenitet Rossijskoj Federacii: problemy`, protivorechiya, mexanizm obespecheniya. Journal of Economic Regulation. T. 5. № 4. S. 126-135. (in Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/THKKNF
2. Afanas`ev, A.A. (2022). Texnologicheskij suverenitet kak nauchnaya kategoriya v sisteme sovremennogo znaniya. E`konomika, predprinimatel`stvo i pravo. T. 12. № 9. S. 2377-2394. (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.12.9.116243; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KEKJUR
3. Axmed`yanova, G.F., & Pishhuxin, A.M. (2022). Ontologicheskij analiz proekta peredovoj inzhenernoj shkoly`. Ontologiya proektirovaniya. T. 12. № 3(45). S. 299-309. (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18287/2223-9537-2022-12-3-299-309 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FMIHYN
4. Bedareva, L.Yu., Blinova, T.N., Lomteva, E.V., & Fedotov, A.V. (2023). Kadry` texnologicheskogo suvereniteta i zadachi transformacii sistemy` SPO: opy`t kompleksnogo analiza. Professional`noe obrazovanie i ry`nok truda. T. 11. № 3. S. 6-25. (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52944/PORT.2023.54.3.001 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JRVRME
5. Blinova, T.N., Fedotov, A.V., Kovalenko, A.A., & Polushkina, E.A. (2021). Sootvetstvie struktury` podgotovki kadrov s vy`sshim obrazovaniem otraslevoj strukture e`konomiki Rossii. M.: Delo RANXiGS. (in Russ.).
6. Blinova, T.N., Kovalenko, A.A., & Fedotov, A.V. (2021). Sopostavitel`ny`j analiz sootvetstviya struktury` i ob``emov podgotovki kadrov s vy`sshim obrazovaniem potrebnostyam razvitiya e`konomiki – regional`ny`j aspekt. M.: Delo RANXiGS. (in Russ.).
7. Blinova, T.N., Kovalenko, A.A., Semionova, E.A., Fedotov, A.V., & Shevczov, E.S. (2022). Kadry` texnologicheskogo suvereniteta Rossii – prezhnie problemy` i nazrevshie resheniya // Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. T. 26. № 4. S. 37-55. (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2022.04.029 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UFKZDO
8. Brilliantova, V.V., Vlasova, V.V., & Fursov, K.S. (2020). Texnologicheskoe raznoobrazie i samoobespechennost` proizvodstva peredovy`mi proizvodstvenny`mi texnologiyami v rossijskix regionax. E`konomika regiona. t. 16. vy`p. 4. S. 1224-1238. (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-4-15. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GFVOYC
9. Gorodnikova, N.V., Goxberg, L.M., & Ditkovskij, K.A. i dr. (2019). Indikatory` innovacionnoj deyatel`nosti: 2019: statisticheskij sbornik. NIU VShE`, M. (in Russ.).
10. Gorodnikova, N.V., Goxberg, L.M., & Ditkovskij, K.A. i dr. (2022). Indikatory` innovacionnoj deyatel`nosti: 2022: statisticheskij sbornik. NIU VShE`, M. (in Russ.).
11. Gudyaeva, L.A., & Pry`gunova, M.I. (2023). Peredovy`e inzhenerny`e shkoly` kak instrument dostizheniya nacional`nogo texnologicheskogo suvereniteta v kontekste regional`noj social`no-e`konomicheskoj povestki. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo. № 1(62). S. 13-19. (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25683/VOLBI.2023.62.504 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XLMSBM
12. Efimov, A.V., & Tixonovskova, S.A. (2022). Texnologicheskij suverenitet Rossii v kontekste strategicheskix celej razvitiya regional`noj e`konomiki. Drukerovskij vestnik. № 4(48). S. 165-172. (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17213/2312-6469-2022-4-165-172; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WUGRQO
13. Indikatory` innovacionnoj deyatel`nosti: 2020: statisticheskij sbornik (2020). L.M. Goxberg, K.A. Ditkovskij, E.I. Evnevich i dr.; Nacz. issled. un-t «Vy`sshaya shkola e`konomiki». M.: NIU VShE`. (in Russ.).
14. Konstantinov, I.B., & Konstantinova, E.P. (2022). Texnologicheskij suverenitet kak strategiya budushhego razvitiya rossijskoj e`konomiki. Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya. T. 22. № 5. S. 12-22. (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/1682-2358-2022-5-12-22; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VEETIV
15. Lenchuk, E.B. (2021). Rossiya v mirovom processe nauchno-texnologicheskogo razvitiya. Kontury` global`ny`x transformacij: politika, e`konomika, pravo. t. 14. № 4. S. 72-91. (in Russ.). http://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-4-5 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DAVRDY
16. Mal`ceva, V.A., & Shabalin, A.I. (2021). Neobxodnoj manevr, ili Bum sprosa na srednee professional`noe obrazovanie v Rossii. Voprosy` obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow. № 2. S. 10-42. (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-2-10-42; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VFPICX
17. O merax gosudarstvennoj podderzhki programm razvitiya peredovy`x inzhenerny`x shkol: postanovlenie Pravitel`stva RF ot 08.04.2022 g. № 619. (in Russ.). https://clck.ru/3DDP5r
18. Petrov, M.N., & Filippov Ya.S. (2023). Texnologicheskij suverenitet: e`volyuciya Rossijskix i zarubezhny`x e`konomicheskix modelej. E`konomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. № 5-1. S. 328-338. (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2023.38.40.116; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KPLJZF
19. Pinchuk, A.Yu. (2021). Formirovanie otechestvennoj inzhenernoj shkoly` kak formy` e`ffektivnogo otveta rossijskogo obshhestva na bol`shie vy`zovy`. CITISE`. № 1(27). S. 425-435. (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2021.1.38; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZKIHBK
20. Prixod`ko, I.I. (2022). Teoreticheskie aspekty` koncepcii texnologicheskogo suvereniteta. Ucheny`e zapiski Kry`mskogo federal`nogo universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. E`konomika i upravlenie. № 4. S. 88-96. (in Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BJFQTC
21. Srednee professional`noe obrazovanie v Rossii: resurs dlya razvitiya e`konomiki i formirovaniya chelovecheskogo kapitala: analiticheskij doklad (2022). F.F. Dudy`rev, K.V. Anisimova, I.A. Artem`ev i dr.; Nacz. issled. un-t «Vy`sshaya shkola e`konomiki». M.: NIU VShE`. (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-2678-1; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IZTOEH
22. Shkaratan, O.I. (2011). Obshhestvo kak social`naya sistema. Sociologicheskij zhurnal. №4. S. 117-143. (in Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PWIOJB
23. Shkodinskij, S.V., Kushnir, A.M., & Prodchenko, I.A. (2022). Vliyanie sankcij na texnologicheskij suverenitet Rossii // Problemy` ry`nochnoj e`konomiki. № 2. S. 75-96. (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33051/2500-2325-2022-2-75-96 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GYKHTL
24. Ćudić, B., Alešnik, P., Hazemali, D. (2022). Factors impacting university – industry collaboration in European countries. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. No. 11(1). Pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-022-00226-3 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RBSSAM
25. Paap, J. (2021). Mapping the Technological Landscape to Accelerate Innovation”. Foresight and STI Governance. vol. 14. no 3, Pp. 41-54. http://doi.org/10.17323/25002597.2020.3.41.54
