Based on a comparison of the guidelines in the Strategies for Technological Development of the Country from 2016 to 2024, a contradiction has been formed in the basic attitudes towards the personnel training system. The authors aim is to present a sociological analysis of the current situation and the existing opportunities for implementing the task of ensuring the technological sovereignty of the country with qualified personnel. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study is built on an appeal to classical works representing society: as a system of T. Parsons, E. Giddens, self-organizing system of N. Luhmann; works covering the issues of the influence of scientific and technological potential on the level of competitiveness; state programs and regulatory documents, as well as statistical and analytical materials. Results. Generalization of data on training programs in secondary vocational education, as well as implemented federal programs for its support allowed us to conclude that at the moment the situation is characterized by a gradual improvement, but the number of graduates is insufficient for the growing needs of production. The reasons are both poor training in natural cycle disciplines in schools and, accordingly, a shortage of teaching staff to solve this problem, and the consequences of the demographic pit of the 90s, which led to a reduction in potential students. The authors believe that the solution to the problem of providing qualified personnel is not so much in the constant increase in the number of graduates, but in the revision of both their training programs and the technologies of the production itself in order to replace the stages of operations that can be performed by unskilled specialists with technological developments based on artificial intelligence. The implementation of an integrated approach should be ensured by revising the training programs in universities and institutes, as well as attracting talented developers to the problem of improving production.
tehnologicheskiy suverenitet, podgotovka kadrov, SPO, vuzy, iskusstvennyy intellekt, rynok truda
1. Andreeva O.V. Tehnologicheskiy i finansovyy suverenitet Rossiyskoy Federacii: problemy, protivorechiya, mehanizm obespecheniya // Journal of Economic Regulation. 2014. T. 5. № 4. S. 126-135.
2. Afanas'ev A.A. Tehnologicheskiy suverenitet kak nauchnaya kategoriya v sisteme sovremennogo znaniya // Ekonomika, predprinimatel'stvo i pravo. 2022. T. 12. № 9. S. 2377-2394.
3. Ahmed'yanova G.F., Pischuhin A.M. Ontologicheskiy analiz proekta peredovoy inzhenernoy shkoly // Ontologiya proektirovaniya. 2022. T. 12. № 3(45). S. 299-309. https://doi.org/10.18287/2223-9537-2022-12-3-299-309.
4. Bedareva L.Yu., Blinova T.N., Lomteva E.V., Fedotov A.V. Kadry tehnologicheskogo suvereniteta i zadachi transformacii sistemy SPO: opyt kompleksnogo analiza // Professional'noe obrazovanie i rynok truda. 2023. T. 11. № 3. S. 6-25. https://doi.org/10.52944/PORT.2023.54.3.001
5. Blinova T.N., Fedotov A.V., Kovalenko A.A., Polushkina E.A. Sootvetstvie struktury podgotovki kadrov s vysshim obrazovaniem otraslevoy strukture ekonomiki Rossii. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom «Delo» RANHiGS. 2021.
6. Blinova T.N., Kovalenko A.A., Fedotov A.V. Sopostavitel'nyy analiz sootvetstviya struktury i ob'emov podgotovki kadrov s vysshim obrazovaniem potrebnostyam razvitiya ekonomiki – regional'nyy aspekt. M.: Delo, 2021.
7. Blinova T.N., Kovalenko A.A., Semionova E.A., Fedotov A.V., Shevcov E.S. Kadry tehnologicheskogo suvereniteta Rossii – prezhnie problemy i nazrevshie resheniya // Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. 2022. T. 26. № 4. S. 37-55. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2022.04.029
8. Brilliantova V.V., Vlasova V.V., Fursov K.S. Tehnologicheskoe raznoobrazie i samoobespechennost' proizvodstva peredovymi proizvodstvennymi tehnologiyami v rossiyskih regionah // Ekonomika regiona. 2020. T. 16. Vyp. 4. S. 1224-1238. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-4-15
9. Gorodnikova N.V., Gohberg L.M., Ditkovskiy K.A. i dr. Indikatory innovacionnoy deyatel'nosti: 2019: statisticheskiy sbornik. NIU VShE, M., 2019.
10. Gorodnikova N.V., Gohberg L.M., Ditkovskiy K.A. i dr. Indikatory innovacionnoy deyatel'nosti: 2022: statisticheskiy sbornik. NIU VShE, M., 2022.
11. Gudyaeva L.A., Prygunova M.I. Peredovye inzhenernye shkoly kak instrument dostizheniya nacional'nogo tehnologicheskogo suvereniteta v kontekste regional'noy social'no-ekonomicheskoy povestki // Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo. 2023. № 1(62). S. 13-19. https://doi.org/10.25683/VOLBI.2023.62.504
12. Efimov A.V., Tihonovskova S.A. Tehnologicheskiy suverenitet Rossii v kontekste strategicheskih celey razvitiya regional'noy ekonomiki // Drukerovskiy vestnik. 2022. № 4 (48). S. 165-172.
13. Indikatory innovacionnoy deyatel'nosti: 2020: statisticheskiy sbornik / L.M. Gohberg, K.A. Ditkovskiy, E.I. Evnevich i dr.; Nac. issled. un-t «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». M.: NIU VShE, 2020.
14. Konstantinov I.B., Konstantinova E.P. Tehnologicheskiy suverenitet kak strategiya buduschego razvitiya rossiyskoy ekonomiki // Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya. 2022. T. 22. № 5. S. 12-22.
15. Lenchuk E.B. Rossiya v mirovom processe nauchno-tehnologicheskogo razvitiya // Kontury global'nyh transformaciy: politika, ekonomika, pravo. 2021. T. 14. № 4. S. 72-91. http://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-4-5
16. Mal'ceva V.A., Shabalin A.I. Neobhodnoy manevr, ili Bum sprosa na srednee professional'noe obrazovanie v Rossii // Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow. 2021. № 2. S. 10-42.
17. O merah gosudarstvennoy podderzhki programm razvitiya peredovyh inzhenernyh shkol: postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 08.04.2022 g. № 619. https://clck.ru/3DDP5r
18. Petrov M.N., Filippov Ya.S. Tehnologicheskiy suverenitet: evolyuciya Rossiyskih i zarubezhnyh ekonomicheskih modeley // Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2023. № 5-1. S. 328-338.
19. Pinchuk A.Yu. Formirovanie otechestvennoy inzhenernoy shkoly kak formy effektivnogo otveta rossiyskogo obschestva na bol'shie vyzovy // CITISE. 2021. № 1(27). S. 425-435.
20. Prihod'ko I.I. Teoreticheskie aspekty koncepcii tehnologicheskogo suvereniteta // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2022. № 4. S. 88-96.
21. Srednee professional'noe obrazovanie v Rossii: resurs dlya razvitiya ekonomiki i formirovaniya chelovecheskogo kapitala: analiticheskiy doklad / F.F. Dudyrev, K.V. Anisimova, I.A. Artem'ev i dr.; Nac. issled. un-t «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». M.: NIU VShE, 2022.
22. Shkaratan O.I. Obschestvo kak social'naya sistema // Sociologicheskiy zhurnal. 2011. №4. S. 117-143.
23. Shkodinskiy S.V., Kushnir A.M., Prodchenko I.A. Vliyanie sankciy na tehnologicheskiy suverenitet Rossii // Problemy rynochnoy ekonomiki. 2022. № 2. S. 75-96. https://doi.org/10.33051/2500-2325-2022-2-75-96
24. Ćudić B., Alešnik P., Hazemali D. Factors impacting university – industry collaboration in European countries // Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 2022. No. 11(1). Pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-022-00226-3
25. Paap J. Mapping the Technological Landscape to Accelerate Innovation” // Foresight and STI Governance. 2021. vol. 14. no 3, Pp. 41-54. http://doi.org/10.17323/25002597.2020.3.41.54
