The article presents the results of the analysis of the genetic structure of the populations of Carassius gibelio (Bloch, 1782) and Carassius carassius (Linnaeus, 1758) by the cytometric method by the size of the area of erythrocyte nuclei. The relevance of the work is due to the discussion on the formation of crucian as one species or several ecological forms and the disappearance of crucian as a species in its natural habitat. We compared crucian carp from different types of water bodies: the Tura river, the Niсa river (the left tributary of the Tura), Lake Krivoe (the Tura oxbow lake, periodically communicating with it), Lake Srednee (isolated, not connected with the Tura for more than 70 years). In all studied water bodies, the diploid form of silver crucian dominates. The proportion of triploids in the Nica river and Lake Krivoe did not exceed 5%, in the lake. The average was equal to 20%, and the maximum (30%) was noted in the Tura. The ratio of cytometrically determined diploids and triploids was: in the river Tura - 2: 1, in the river Nica – 19:1, in Lake Krivoe – 17:1, in Lake Srednee 3:1. At the same time, from 5 to 18% of individuals were not determined by ploidy, their largest number was noted in the sample from Lake Srednee. When comparing the area of erythrocyte nuclei in silver and gold crucian from the lake. The average overlap zone was found at the level of 45–54 µm2, which suggests natural hybridization of the populations of these species.
citogeneticheskaya struktura populyaciy, Carassius gibelio, Carassius carassius, basseyn reki Tura
1. Abramenko M.I. Differencial'naya izbiratel'nost' samcov serebryanogo karasya Carassius auratus gibelio pri brachnom uhazhivanii za samkami biseksual'noy i ginogeneticheskoy form // Pervyy kongress ihtiologov Rossii. M.: VNIRO, 1997. 185 s.
2. Abramenko M.I. Adaptivnye mehanizmy rasprostraneniya i dinamiki chislennosti Carassius auratus gibelio v Ponto-Kaspiyskom regione (na primere Azovskogo basseyna) // Rossiyskiy zhurnal biologicheskihinvaziy. 2011. №2. S. 3–27.
3. Abramenko M.I., Nedviga I.V. Retrospektivnyy analiz prichin i posledstviy vspyshki chislennosti serebryanogo karasya Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch, 1782) v Cimlyanskom vodohranilische // Cimlyanskoe vodohranilische: sostoyanie vodnyh i pribrezhnyh ekosistem, problemy i puti resheniya. 2011. S. 46–61.
4. Annotirovannyy katalog kruglorotyh i ryb kontinental'nyh vod Rossii. M.: Nauka, 1998. 220 s.
5. Vasil'eva E.D. O morfologicheskoy divergencii ginogeneticheskoy i biseksual'noy form serebryanogo karasya Carassius auratus (Cyprinidae, Pisces) // Zoologicheskiy zhurnal. 1990. №11. S. 97–110.
6. Vehov D.A. Nekotorye problemnye voprosy biologii serebryanogo karasya Sarassius auratus s.lato // Nauchno-tehnicheskiy byulleten' laboratorii ihtiologii INENKO. 2013. №19. S. 5–38.
7. Golovinskaya K.A., Romashov D.D., Cherfas N.B. Odnopolye i dvupolye formy serebryanogo karasya (Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch)) // Voprosy ihtiologii. 1965. T. 5. №4. S. 614–629.
8. Goryunova A.I., Isbekov K.B., Asylbekova S.Zh., Dan'ko E.K. O karasyah periodicheski vysyhayuschih stepnyh ozer Severnogo Kazahstana v svete sovremennyh otechestvennyh i zarubezhnyh issledovaniy // Promyslovye vidy i ih biologiya. Trudy VNIRO. 2017. T. 165. S. 27–44.
9. Dgebuadze Yu.Yu., Petrosyan V.G., Hlyap L.A. Samye opasnye invazionnye vidy Rossii (TOP-100). M.: Tovarischestvo nauchnyh izdaniy KMK. 2018. 688 s.
10. Lakin G.F. Biometriya. M: Vysshaya shkola, 1990. 352 s.
11. Pavlov D.A. Zhiznennyy cikl dvuh vidov roda Carassius (Cyprinidae) v usloviyah simpatrii // Voprosy ihtiologii. 2022. T. 62. №6. S. 721–736.
12. Pospelova E.S., Smolina N.V. Ihtiofauna i promysel v Tyumenskoy oblasti (yug) // Aktual'nye voprosy nauki i hozyaystva: novye vyzovy i resheniya. Sb. mat-lov LV stud. nauchn.-prakt. konf. Tyumen'. 2021. S. 626–632.
13. Pravdin I.F. Rukovodstvo po izucheniyu ryb. Izd. 4-e dop. M.: Pischevaya promyshlennost', 1966. 376 s.
14. Mezhzherin S.V., Liseckiy I.L. Geneticheskaya struktura populyaciy karasey (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae, Carassius L., 1758), naselyayuschih vodoemy Srednedneprovskogo basseyna // Citologiya i genetika. 2004. №5. S. 35–44.
15. Yankova N.V. Ekologo-morfologicheskie osobennosti diploidno-triploidnyh kompleksov serebryanogo karasya Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch) na primere ozer mezhdurech'ya Tobol-Tavda: avtoref. dis. ... kandidat biologicheskih nauk. Tyumen'. 2006. 22 s.
16. Knytl, M., Kalous, L., Symonová, R., Rylková, K., Ráb, P. Chromosome studies of European cyprinid fishes: cross-species painting reveals natural allotetraploid origin of Carassius female with 206 chromosomes. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 2013. Vol. 139. P. 276–283.
17. Hänfling, B., Bolton, P., Harley, M., Carvalho G.R. A molecular approach to detect hybridisation between crucian carp (Carassius carassius) and non-indigenous carp species (Carassius spp. and Cyprinus carpio) // Freshwater Biology. 2005. Vol. 50. P. 403–417.
18. Haynes G.D., Gongora J., Gilligan D.M., et al. Cryptic hybridization and introgression between invasive Cyprinid species Cyprinus carpio and Carassius auratus in Australia: implications for invasive species management // Animal Conservation. 2012. Vol. 15. P. 83–94.
19. Papošek I., Vetesnik L., Halacka K., et al. Identification of natural hybrids of gibel carp Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch) and crucian carp Carassius carassius (L.) from lower Dyje River floodplain (Czech Republic) // Journal of Fish Biology. 2008. Vol. 72. P. 1230–1235.
20. Wouters J., Janson S., Lusková V., Olsén K.H. Molecular identification of hybrids of the invasive gibel carp Carassius auratus gibelio and crucian carp Carassius carassius in Swedish waters // Journal of Fish Biology. 2012. Vol. 80. № 7. P. 2595–2604.
