The aim of the study was to study the peculiarities of the divorce process of women with adulterers both in the central dioceses and on the periphery in the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries. The results of the study of the issue as a result of the analysis of cases of divorce by the Tver, Yaroslavl and Tobolsk spiritual consistories are presented. Particular attention is paid to the forms of male adultery that existed at that time and the dependence of the probability of ending the case in divorce on their severity. It was found that it was easiest to obtain permission for a divorce if there were witnesses who had the opportunity to confirm the husband's family relationship with another woman, and moreover, the birth of an illegitimate child with them. The article presents the stages of the divorce process due to male adultery, the main categories of terms for solving such cases. The hypothesis was confirmed that it was more difficult for peasant women than for representatives of other classes to get a divorce from a traitor husband, this was hampered by both low literacy and ignorance of the laws, and fear of consequences from her husband, and over time their literacy increased, and patriarchal views remained in early 20th century Of the cases examined, only in those related to peasant divorces did the spouses agree to reconcile, peasant cases almost never ended in divorce. Differences in motives are also interesting: for peasant women, the primary desire, even a necessity, was to enter into a new marriage in order to find a master, breadwinner and assistant in the house, for other estates, divorce was the motive, since treason was considered an “insult”.
Tverskaya, Yaroslavskaya, Tobol'skaya gubernii, duhovnye konsistorii, rastorzhenie braka, prichiny, zhenschiny, krest'yanki, prelyubodeyanie, nezakonnorozhdennye deti
1. Barsov T.V. O posledstviyah rastorzheniya braka v sluchae prelyubodeyaniya. SPb.: tip. F. Eleonskogo i K°, cenz. 1882, 44 s.
2. Belosludceva V.V. «Kak zhe ya mogu zhenit'sya na tebe, kogda ya zhenat?»: o rastorzhenii braka v Permskoy gubernii v konce XIX – nachale XX veka // Vestnik Permskogo un-ta. Istoriya. 2020. Vyp. 4 (51). S. 117-126.
3. Byhovskiy V.V. Brak, razdel'noe zhitel'stvo suprugov i razvod. M.: V.M. Sablin, 1912. 277, V s.
4. GATO. F. 160. Op. 1-2. D. 7652, D. 7665, D. 7822, D. 7828; Op. 1-37. D. 12124; Op. 1-54. D. 13382; GAYaO. F. 230. Op. 4. D. 1517, 1538, 1550, 1559, 1750; Op. 6. D. 306, 398, 707, 831, 917a.
5. GAYaO. F. 230. Op. 4. D. 1538; Op. 6. D. 398.
6. GAYaO. F. 230. Op. 4. D. 1608.
7. GAYaO. F. 230. Op. 6. D. 307.
8. GKUTO GATO (Gosudarstvennoe kazennoe uchrezhdenie Tverskoy oblasti «Gosudarstvennyy arhiv Tverskoy oblasti»). F. 160. Op. 1-2. D. 6886; GKU YaO GAYaO (Gosudarstvennoe kazennoe uchrezhdenie Yaroslavskoy oblasti «Gosudarstvennyy arhiv Yaroslavskoy oblasti»). F. 230. Op. 4. D. 1513, 1545, 1546, 1608, 1617; Op. 6. D. 307, 319, 524; GUTO GAT. (Gosudarstvennoe uchrezhdenie Tyumenskoy oblasti «Gosudarstvennyy arhiv v g. Tobol'ske»). F. I-156. Op. 11. D. 850; Op. 11. D. 1390; Op. 18. D. 77; Op. 18. D. 321; Op. 18. D. 371; Op. 18. D. 570; Op. 18. D. 1032.
9. GKUTO GATO. F. 160. Op. 1-2. D. 6886; GUTO GAT. F. I-156. Op. 11. D. 850.
10. Grigorovskiy S.P. Prichiny i posledstviya razvoda i brakorazvodnyy process na sude duhovnom. SPb.: parovaya skoropech. Ya.I. Libermana, 1898. 92 s.
11. GUTO GAT. F. I-156.
12. Maksimov V.Ya. Zakony o razvode pravoslavnogo i nepravoslavnogo ispovedaniy i o razdel'nom zhitel'stve suprugov, s raz'yasneniyami Pravitel'stvuyuschego senata i cirkulyarnymi i separatnymi ukazami Svyateyshego sinoda: Rukovodstvo k vedeniyu brakorazvod. del / Sost. V. Maksimov. M.: Yurist, 1909. 428, LII s.
13. Mareeva E.P. Cerkovnyy faktor v demograficheskom povedenii naseleniya Tambovskoy gubernii v XIX – nachale XX v.: Avtoref. dis. … kand. ist. nauk. Tambov, 2003. 25 s.
14. Muhina Z.Z. Razvody v russkoy krest'yanskoy sem'e v poreformennoy Rossii: gendernyy aspekt // Vestnik Rossiyskogo un-ta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Istoriya Rossii. 2013. № 1. S. 49-63.
15. Prohorova K.S., Makarova E.A. Problemy prakticheskoy realizacii instituta rastorzheniya braka v Novgorodskoy gubernii v konce XIX – nachale XX vv. // BENEFICIUM. 2019. № 4 (33). S. 101-106.
16. Trefilova M.N. Transformaciya brachno-semeynyh otnosheniy zhiteley gorodov Verhney Volgi v konce 1890-h – 1927 gg. Avtoref. ... kand. ist. nauk. Ivanovo, 2013. 28 s.
17. Tuchkova A.A. «Rashod» v sem'yah novgorodskih krest'yan vtoroy poloviny XIX – nachala XX veka // Retrospektiva: vsemirnaya istoriya glazami molodyh issledovateley. Kaliningrad: Baltiyskiy federal'nyy universitet im. I. Kanta, 2014. № 8. S. 31- 42.
18. Frolova T.V. Gorodskaya sem'ya v XIX v. (na materialah gorodov Yaroslavskoy gubernii): Avtoref. ... kand. ist. nauk. Ivanovo, 2008. 23 s.
19. Yanenko O.Yu. Rastorzhenie braka v Rossiyskoy imperii na rubezhe XIX-XX vv. // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Social'no-gumanitarnye nauki». 2013. T. 13. № 1. S. 192-194.
20. Perevozchikova L.S., Ershov B.A., Ashmarov I.A., Volkova, E.A. Role of Russian Orthodox Church in Life of Peasants in Russia in XIX – the beginning of the XXth centuries // Bylye gody. 2017. № 43, is. 1. P. 121-128.
