Laboratory chronic experiments have determined the effect of the content of petroleum products (PP) in reclaimed alluvial turf heavy loamy and light loamy soil on the growth, yield of green mass and the development of the root system of spring wheat and seed peas. High residual PP content in reclaimed soil resulted in increased seed germination time, with no effect on germination. When growing wheat on reclaimed alluvial turf heavy loamy soil, the toxic effect was manifested only in the early stages of plant development in a variant containing 16.9 g/kg of PP. In the alluvial turf light loamy soil version containing 21.8 g/kg of pollutant, inhibition of plant growth was observed throughout the experiment. In chronic experiments for growing peas on heavy coal soil containing 16.9 g/kg of PP, on light coal soil containing 11.7 g/kg and higher, plant growth inhibition was observed, with a tendency to increase the toxic effect towards the end of the growing experience. Oil contaminants in concentration up to 11-12 g/kg in reclaimed alluvial turf heavy and light-coal soils do not affect the yield of green wheat mass, in concentration 9.7 g/kg and higher inhibit the growth of pea plants, lead to a decrease in the yield of their green mass. The oxidation efficiency of petroleum products when growing plants on reclaimed alluvial turf soil did not exceed 37% and was determined by the initial concentration of pollutant. The presence of PP in the soil led to a change in the structure of the root system of the plants being grown. Tested plants when cultivated on heavy soils are more resistant to negative PP. The findings show that sown peas are more sensitive to the presence of PP in reclaimed soil.
allyuvial'nye pochvy, nefteprodukty (NP), rekul'tivaciya, rasteniya, pshenica, goroh
1. Vershinin A.A., Karimullin L.K., Petrov A.M., Kuznecova T.V. Vliyanie fitorekul'tivacionnyh meropriyatiy na aktivnost' mikrobnogo soobschestvaneftezagryaznennoy allyuvial'noy dernovoy pochvy // Rossiyskiy zhurnal prikladnoy ekologii. 2021. №1. S. 52-57.
2. GOST R ISO 22033-2009 «Kachestvo pochvy. Biologicheskie metody. Hronicheskaya toksichnost' v otnoshenii vysshih rasteniy».
3. Zaynulgabidinov E.R., Ignat'ev Yu.A, Petrov A.M. Optimizaciya metoda poteri massy pri prokalivanii dlya opredeleniya ostatochnogo soderzhaniya organicheskih soedineniy nefti v zagryaznennyh pochvah // Rossiyskiy zhurnal prikladnoy ekologii. 2021. №1. S. 64-71.
4. Ignat'ev Yu.A., Zaynulgabidinov E.R., Petrov A.M. Primenenie metoda prokalivaniya dlya opredeleniya soderzhaniya allohtonnyh uglevodorodov nefti v seryh lesnyh pochvah // Rossiyskiy zhurnal prikladnoy ekologii. 2018. №3. S. 34-37.
5. Kireeva N.A., Vodop'yanov V.V. Monitoring rasteniy, ispol'zuemyh dlya fitoremediacii neftezagryaznennyh pochv // Ekologiya i promyshlennost' Rossii. 2007. №9. S. 46-47.
6. Kireeva N.A., Grigoriadi A.S., Bashirova R.M., Amirova A.R. Ispol'zovanie barhatcev pryamostoyachih Tagetes erecta L. dlya fitoremediacii pochvy, zagryaznennoy neftyanymi uglevodorodami // Agrohimiya. 2012. №5. S. 66-72.
7. Kireeva N.A., Grigoriadi A.S., Vodop'yanov V.V., Amirova A.R. Podbor rasteniy dlya fitoremediacii pochv, zagryaznennyh neftyanymi uglevodorodami // Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra RAN. 2011. T. 13, №5. S. 184–187.
8. Kol'cova T.G., Grigor'yan B.R., Sungatullina L.M., Petrov A.M., Bashkirov V.N. Ocenka fitotoksichnosti seryh lesnyh pochv v usloviyah neftyanogo zagryazneniya // Vestnik Tehnologicheskogo universiteta. 2016. T. 19. №18. S. 185-191.
9. Mazunina L.E. Osobennosti anatomii i morfologii vysshih rasteniy v usloviyah neftyanogo zagryazneniya // Vestnik Nizhnevartovskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. 2009. №1. S. 16-18.
10. Petrov A.M., Zaynulgabidinov E.R., Shagidullin R.R., Ivanov D.V., Kuznecova T.V., Karimullin L.K. Razrabotka normativov dopustimogo ostatochnogo soderzhaniya nefti i produktov ee transformacii v pochvah dlya zemel' lesnogo fonda respubliki tatarstan // Vestnik Kazanskogo tehnologicheskogo universiteta. 2013. T. 16. №20. S. 265-270.
11. Utombaeva A.A., Petrov A.M., Zaynulgabidinov E.R., Ignat'ev Yu.A., Kuznecova T.V. Dinamika rosta vysshih rasteniy na rekul'tivirovannyh neftezagryaznennyh allyuvial'nyh lugovyh pochvah raznogo granulometricheskogo sostava // Rossiyskiy zhurnal prikladnoy ekologii. 2020. №1. S. 60-65.
12. FR.1.39.2006.02264. Metodika vypolneniya izmereniy vshozhesti semyan i dliny korney prorostkov vysshih rasteniy dlya opredeleniya toksichnosti tehnogenno zagryaznennyh pochv 2009. S-Pb. 22 s.
13. Shagidullin R.R., Petrov A.M., Ivanov D.V., Tarasov O.Yu., Shagidullina R.A., Bufatina M.A. Metodicheskie podhody k normirovaniyu soderzhaniya nefti i produktov ee transformacii v pochvah // Ekologiya i promyshlennost' Rossii. 2011. №6. S. 24-286.
14. Adam G., Duncan H. Influence of diesel fuel on seed germination // Environmental pollution. 2002. Vol. 120. №2. P. 363-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00119-7
15. Allamin I.A., Halmi M.I.E., Yasid N.A., Ahmad S.A., Abdullah S.R.S., Shukor Y. Rhizodegradation of petroleum oily sludge-contaminated soil using Cajanus cajan increases the diversity of soil microbial community // Scientific reports. 2020. Vol. 10. №1. P. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60668-1
16. Alotaibi F., Hijri M., St-Arnaud M. Overview of Approaches to Improve Rhizoremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Soils // Applied Microbiology. 2021. Vol. 1. №2. P. 329-351. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol1020023
17. Dmitrieva T.V. Phytoremediation of Oil-Sludge-Contaminated Soil // International Journal of Phytoremediation. 2008. Vol.10. №6. P. 486-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226510802114920
18. Euliss K., Ho C. H., Schwab A. P., Rock S., Banks M. K.Greenhouse and field assessment of phytoremediation for petroleum contaminants in a riparian zone // Bioresource technology. 2008. Vol. 99. №6. P. 1961-1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.055
19. Gamage S.S.W., Masakorala K., Brown M.T., Gamage S.M.K. W. Tolerance of Impatiens balsamina L., and Crotalaria retusa L. to grow on soil contaminated by used lubricating oil: A comparative study // Ecotoxicology and environmental safety. 2020. Vol. 188. P. 109911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109911
20. Haider F.U., Ejaz M., Cheema S.A., Khan M.I., Zhao B., Liqun C., Mustafa A. Phytotoxicity of petroleum hydrocarbons: Sources, impacts and remediation strategies // Environmental Research. 2021. Vol. 197. P. 111031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111031
21. Hoang S.A., Lamb D., Seshadri B., Sarkar B., Cheng Y., Wang L., Bolan N. S Petroleum hydrocarbon rhizoremediation and soil microbial activity improvement via cluster root formation by wild proteaceae plant species // Chemosphere. 2021. Vol. 275. P. 130135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130135
22. Huybrechts M., Cuypers A., Deckers J., Iven V., Vandionant S., Jozefczak M., Hendrix S. Cadmium and plant development: an agony from seed to seed // International journal of molecular sciences. 2019. Vol. 20. №16. P. 3971. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20163971
23. Kondrashina V., Strijakova E., Zinnatshina L., Bocharnikova E., Vasilyeva G. Influence of activated carbon and other additives on bioremediation rate and characteristics of petroleum-contaminated soils // Soil Science. 2018. Vol. 183. №4. P. 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0000000000000234
24. Mukome F.N., Buelow M.C., Shang J., Peng J., Rodriguez M., Mackay D.M., Parikh S.J. Biochar amendment as a remediation strategy for surface soils impacted by crude oil // Environmental Pollution. 2020. Vol. 265. P. 115006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115006
25. Muratova A.Y., Dmitrieva T.V., Panchenko L.V., Turkovskaya O.V. Phytoremediation of oil-sludge–contaminated soil // International Journal of Phytoremediation. 2008. Vol. 10. №6. P. 486-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226510802114920
26. Panchenko L., Muratova A., Turkovskaya O. Comparison of the phytoremediation potentials of Medicago falcata L. and Medicago sativa L. in aged oil-sludge-contaminated soil // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017. Vol. 24. №3. P. 3117-3130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8025-y
27. Prabakaran K., Li J., Anandkumar A., Leng Z., Zou C.B., Du D. Managing environmental contamination through phytoremediation by invasive plants: A review // Ecological Engineering. 2019. Vol. 138. P. 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.07.002
28. Vasilyeva G.K., Kondrashina V.S., Strijakova E.R., Pinsky D.L. Express-phytotest for choosing conditions and following process of soil remediation // Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2020. P. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-020-00727-8
