In the article discussed history of building Astrakhan and Selenga paper and cardboard mills. The author on base archival materials is analyzing the impact of expert commentary on the building paper and cardboard mills. The main purpose of the article is to show, on the example of the construction of the CCC, the process of relations between scientific expert groups and government representatives on the issue of environmental safety in the design and location of the country's production facilities. In addition, the author emphasizes that for the Soviet leadership, issues of the environmental component of enterprises often became secondary, departing from economic necessity. At the same time, the scientific community itself did not in some cases have a single position on a particular issue, since a conflict arose between representatives of departmental and scientific academic structures, which was most pronounced during the construction of the Selenginsky pulp and cardboard plant. In the case of the Astrakhan pulp and cardboard plant project, it is shown that underestimating the capabilities of the resource base of production can lead to environmental problems. Author marked that despite of scientific and technological inspection, scientific opinions was ignored by government leaders in cases large technological objects.
ekologicheskaya istoriya, Astrahanskiy CKK, Selenginskiy CKK, cellyulozno-bumazhnaya promyshlennost', ekspertnoe mnenie
1. Borisov V.A., Belousova L.S., Vinokurov A.A. Ohranyaemye prirodnye territorii mira. Nacional'nye parki, zapovedniki, rezervatory. M., 1985. 310 s.
2. Gonina N.V. Istoricheskiy opyt prirodopol'zovaniya v Angaro-Eniseyskom regione 1945–1970 gg. Krasnoyarsk, 2009. 175 s.
3. Gololobov E.I. Chelovek i priroda na Ob'-Irtyshskom Severe (1917–1930): istoricheskie korni sovremennyh ekologicheskih problem. Hanty-Mansiysk, 2013. 222 s.
4. Gusev O.K. Svyaschennyy Baykal: Zapovednye zemli Baykala. M., 1986. 184 s.
5. Durnovcev V.I. Ekologicheskaya istoriya Rossii: chto vperedi? // Problemy ekologii i ustoychivogo razvitiya. M., 2010. S. 45–71.
6. Zulyar Yu.A. Ocherki istorii prirodopol'zovaniya v Baykal'skom regione v XX veke. Irkutsk, 2002. 496 s.
7. Zulyar Yu.A. Baykal'skoe ekologicheskoe dvizhenie: istoriya, dostizheniya, problemy i perspektivy // Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. № 4–1 (64). S. 83–87.
8. Kallimulin A.M. Istoricheskoe issledovanie regional'nyh ekologicheskih problem. M., 2006. 369 s.
9. Karpov V.P. Sever i Arktika v «General'noy perspektive» SSSR: problemy kompleksnogo osvoeniya // Ural'skiy istoricheskiy vestnik. 2016. № 1. S. 91–98.
10. Kochetkova E.A. Tehnologicheskaya modernizaciya v SSSR v 1950–60-e gody (na primere Svetogorskogo cellyulozno-bumazhnogo kombinata) // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. 2014. № 1(24). S. 194–205.
11. Materialy Tret'ey Irkutskoy oblastnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii po ohrane i racional'nomu ispol'zovaniyu prirodnyh resursov / Otv. red. S.A. Merkur'ev. Irkutsk, 1974. 198 s.
12. Ohrana prirody Sibiri: Materialy Pervoy Sibirskoy konferencii. Irkutsk, 1959. 191 s.
13. Pivovarov N.Yu. Sovetskie eksportno-importnye plany i ih realizaciya: chto prodaval i chto poku-pal SSSR vo vtoroy polovine 1950-h godov // Elektronnyy nauchno-obrazovatel'nyy zhurnal «Istoriya». 2018. T. 9. Vyp. 7(71). https://doi.org/10.18254/S0002410-0-2
14. Postanovleniya Soveta Ministrov SSSR za fevral' 1956 g. M., 1956. 275 s.
15. Radkau Y. Priroda i vlast'. Vsemirnaya istoriya okruzhayuschey sredy. M., 2014. 505 s.
16. Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy arhiv ekonomiki (RGAE). F. 9480. Op. 3. D. 1154.
17. RGAE. F. 355. Op. 1. D. 67.
18. RGAE. F. 4372. Op. 65. D. 920.
19. RGAE. F. 9480. Op. 7. D. 530.
20. Fursenko A.A. Prezidium CK KPSS. 1954–1964. Chernovye protokol'nye zapisi zasedaniy. Stenogrammy. Postanovleniya: V 3 t. T. 1. Chernovye protokol'nye zapisi zasedaniy. Stenogrammy. M., 2015. 1370 s.
21. Shtil'mark F.R. Obzor razvitiya zapovednoy sistemy Sibiri // Zapovedniki. M., 1999. S. 18–26.
22. Breyfogle N. At the Watershed: 1958 and the Beginnings of Lake Baikal Environmentalism // Slavonic and East European Review. 2015. No. 1. R. 147–180. https://doi.org/10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.93.1.0147
23. Brain S. Song of the forest: Russian forestry and Stalinist environmentalism, 1905–1953. University of Pitts-burgh Press, 2011.
24. Kelley D.R. Environmental policy-making in the USSR: The role of industrial and environmental interest groups // Soviet Studies. 1976. Vol. 28. No. 4. P. 570–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668137608411091
25. Josephson P.R. An environmental history of Russia. Cambridge, 2013. 200 r. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139021043
26. Josephson P.R. The Conquest of the Russian Arctic. Harvard, 2014.
27. Josephson P.R. Industrialized Nature. Island Press, 2002.
28. Josephson P.R. New Atlantis revisited: Akademgorodok, the Siberian city of science. Princeton University Press, 1997.
29. Venable S. Protecting Lake Baikal: Environmental Policy Making in Russia’s Transition. Saarbrucken, 2008. 200 p.
30. Weiner D.R. Models of Nature. Los Angeles, 1990. 600 r.
31. Weiner D.R. A little corner of freedom: Russian nature protection from Stalin to Gorbachev. Los Angeles, 1999. 556 r.
