The article presents the findings of large-scale sociological survey titled ‘Assessment of the distance learning mode in the self-isolation conditions by educators of Rostov Region.’ The survey reflects the opinion of 8,079 teachers, including 7,608 women and 470 men, who work in general education. The relevance of the study is significant given that the entire general education system of the Russian Federation was urgently transferred to the distance learning mode due to the rapid spread of novel coronavirus in first-half 2020. The respondents assessed their own technical and material conditions in which they carried out the educational activities. The survey included analyses of the financial capabilities necessary to ensure the educational process in distance learning from home and the state of health of teachers working in the distant mode. The presented findings indicate that the teaching community negatively assessed the transition. The health of teachers suffered due to long hours in front of the computer, the effectiveness of teaching decreased, and transferability of learning deteriorated due to deficiencies in technical equipment. The article draws a general conclusion that for the present distance education cannot be a full-fledged alternative to general education in its traditional form.
distancionnoe obrazovanie, effektivnost' obrazovaniya, obschee obrazovanie, samoizolyaciya, pandemiya
1. Abramova M. A., Liberska H. Princip kul'turosoobraznosti v professional'noy podgotovke uchiteley // Vestnik Nizhnevartovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2019. №1. S. 4-9. https://doi.org/10.36906/2311-4444/19-1/01
2. Aglyamzyanova G. N., Abaydulin R. N. Distancionnoe obuchenie v praktike sovremennogo obrazovaniya i puti ego sovershenstvovaniya // Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya. 2018. № 60-1. S. 6-10.
3. Boronenko T. A., Kaysina A. V., Fedotova V. S. Dialog v distancionnom obuchenii // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2017. № 8-9. S. 131-134.
4. Gryaznova E. V., Bryzgalova Yu. V., Izmest'eva N. V., Nikolaeva L. K. K voprosu o prirode distancionnogo obrazovaniya // Azimut nauchnyh issledovaniy: pedagogika i psihologiya. 2018. T. 7. № 4 (25). S. 169-171.
5. Zhusov D. L., Androsov A. Yu., Luk'yanchikova M. E. Metodika formirovaniya individual'nyh znaniy interv'yueram pri provedenii sociologicheskih oprosov // Izvestiya TulGU. Tehnicheskie nauki. 2019. № 3. S. 223-230.
6. Igol'nik O. V. Distancionnoe obuchenie v Rossii // Academy. 2018. № 9(36). S. 36-37.
7. Kamenev R. V., Krasheninnikov V. V., Trockaya A. I. Mediaobrazovanie i professional'naya podgotovka pedagogov // Vestnik Nizhnevartovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2019. № 1. S. 65-71. https://doi.org/10.36906/2311-4444/19-1/10
8. Margolina Zh. B., Shumilova N. A. Neformal'noe obrazovanie v kontekste organizacii nepreryvnogo professional'nogo obrazovaniya v sovremennyh usloviyah // Vestnik Nizhnevartovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2018. № 2. S. 62-68.
9. Romanov Yu. V. Sistema ocenivaniya: opyt osmysleniya i ispol'zovaniya // Pinskaya M. A. Formiruyuschee ocenivanie: ocenivanie v klasse. M., 2010. S. 177-184.
10. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Rostovskoy oblasti ot 05.04.2020 № 272 «O merah po obespecheniyu sanitarno-epidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya na territorii Rostovskoy oblasti v svyazi s rasprostraneniem novoy koronavirusnoy infekcii (COVID-19)». https://clck.ru/Mq5r6
11. Sysoev P. V., Hmarenko N. I. Modeli distancionnogo obucheniya // Voprosy metodiki prepodavaniya v vuze: ezhegodnyy sbornik. 2015. № 4(18). S. 32-36.
12. Shatunovskiy V. L., Shatunovskaya E. A. Esche raz o distancionnom obuchenii (organizaciya i obespechenie distancionnogo obucheniya) // Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya. 2020. № 9-1(87). S. 53-56.
