SOIL MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES AS A SOURCE OF STRAINS FOR THE BIOLOGICAL PROTECTION OF SOYBEANS AGAINST FUSARIUM IN THE YENISEI SIBERIA
Rubrics: ARTICLES
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Eighteen strains of bacterial antagonists inhibiting growth of Fusarium pathogens of soybean were isolated from soil microbial communities of the Yenisei Siberia. The two most active antagonists (RSA-1 strain, preliminary identified as Bacillus sp., and RSA-13 strain, preliminary identified as Streptomyces sp.) were tested as biological agents to protect soybeans from Fusarium infections in vitro . In the absence of artificial infection, the RSA-1 strain reduced the Fusarium incidence by 25 percentage points (from 61.5% to 36.5%, the statistical significance of the effect was p <0.001), and the RSA-13 strain reduced the Fusarium incidence by 32 percentage points (to 29.5%, the statistical significance of the effect p <0.001). Artificial infection of soybean with Fusarium increased the disease incidence up to 83.5% and reduced the length of seedlings by 1.9 times. In case of artificial infection with Fusarium , the RSA-1 strain statistically significantly (p <0.001) reduced the incidence of the disease by 29 percentage points and statistically significantly (p <0.001) reduced the inhibitory effect of the infection on seedling growth. Strain RSA-13 did not affect the incidence of the disease, however, statistically significantly (p <0.001) reduced the inhibitory effect of infection on the growth of seedlings.

Keywords:
soya, fuzarioz, Prieniseyskaya Sibir', biologicheskaya zaschita
References

1. Baranov V. F., Mahonin V. L. O biologicheskoy zaschite agrofitocenozov soi ot vrednyh organizmov // Maslichnye kul'tury. 2014. Vyp. 1 (157-158). S. 152-164.

2. Gorobey I. M., Ashmarina L. F., Konyaeva N. M. Fuzariozy zernobobovyh kul'tur v lesostepnoy zone Zapadnoy Sibiri // Zaschita i karantin rasteniy. 2011. № 2. S. 14-16.

3. Zharkova S. V., Manylova O. V. Effektivnost' biofungicida Metabakterin, SP na posevah soi Glycine max (L.) Merrill // Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2018. № 12 (170). S. 5-10.

4. Zaostrovnyh V. I., Kadurov A. A., Dubovickaya L. K., Ryazanova O. A. Monitoring vidovogo sostava bolezney soi v razlichnyh zonah soeseyaniya // Dal'nevostochnyy agrarnyy vestnik. 2018. № 4 (48). S. 51-67. https://doi.org/10.24411/1999-6837-2018-14081

5. Kurilova D. A. Vredonosnost' fuzarioza soi v zavisimosti ot stepeni porazheniya rasteniy // Maslichnye kul'tury. 2010. № 2(144-145). S. 84-89.

6. Maslienko L. V., Kurilova D. A., Shipievskaya E. Yu., Asaturova A. M. Pervichnyy skrining shtammov gribov i bakteriy antagonistov k vozbuditelyu fuzarioza soi // Maslichnye kul'tury. 2009. № 1(140). S. 114-119.

7. Mezhgosudarstvennyy standart GOST 12044-93 «Semena sel'skohozyaystvennyh kul'tur. Metody opredeleniya zarazhennosti boleznyami». Prinyat 21 oktyabrya 1993 g.

8. Semykin V. A., Pigorev I. Ya., Tarasov A. A., Glinushkin A. P., Plygun S. A., Sycheva I. I. Mikrobnye preparaty i regulyator rosta kak sredstva biologizacii zemledeliya // Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences. 2016. T. 11. № 59. S. 3-9. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2016-11.01

9. Churakov A. A. Napravleniya selekcii soi v Krasnoyarskom krae // Zernobobovye kul'tury, razvivayuscheesya napravlenie v Rossii: Vtoroy Mezhdunarodnyy forum (Omsk, 17-20 iyulya 2018 g.). Omsk: Poligraficheskiy centr KAN, 2018. S. 175-180.

10. Shternshis M. V., Belyaev A. A., Cvetkova V. P., Shpatova T. V., Lelyak A. A., Bahvalov S. A. Biopreparaty na osnove bakteriy roda Bacillus dlya upravleniya zdorov'em rasteniy. Novosibirsk: izd-vo SO RAN. 2016. 284 s.

11. Hizhnyak S. V., Puchkova E. P., Petrushkina S. A. Ekspress-metod vyyavleniya shtammov-antagonistov dlya biologicheskoy zaschity rasteniy ot fitopatogennyh gribov // Prioritetnye napravleniya nauchno-tehnologicheskogo razvitiya agropromyshlennogo kompleksa Rossii: Materialy Nacional'noy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. 2019. Ch. 2. S. 590-594.

12. Amaria W., Soesanthy F., Ferry Y. The Effectiveness of Biofungicide Trichoderma sp. with Three Kinds of Carrier on White Root Disease Rigidoporus microporus // Jurnal Tanaman Industri dan Penyegar. 2016. V. 3. № 1. P. 37-44. https://doi.org/10.21082/jtidp.v3n1.2016.p37-44

13. Anderson E. J., Ali M. L., Beavis W. D., Chen P., Clemente T. E., Diers B. W., Nelson R. L. et al. Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Breeding: History, Improvement, Production and Future Opportunities // Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Legumes. Springer, Cham, 2019. P. 431-516. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23400-3_12

14. Butu M., Stef R., Grozea I., Corneanu M., Butnariu M. Biopesticides: Clean and Viable Technology for Healthy Environment // Bioremediation and Biotechnology. 2020. P. 107-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35691-0_6

15. Delaney M., ArchMiller A. A., Delaney D. P., Wilson A. E., Sikora E. J. Effectiveness of fungicide on soybean rust in the southeastern united states: a meta-analysis // Sustainability. 2018. V. 10. № 6. P. 1784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061784

16. Dean R., Van Kan J. A., Pretorius Z. A., Hammond-Kosack K. E., Di Pietro A., Spanu P. D.,.. Foster G. D. The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology // Molecular plant pathology. 2012. V. 13. № 4. P. 414-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x

17. Food and Agricultural organization. Food and agricultural data. URL http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC

18. Grichar, W. J. Soybean (Glycine max L.) Response to Fungicides in the Absence of Disease Pressure // International Journal of Agronomy. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/561370

19. Haddad P. E., Leite L. G., Lucon C. M. M., Harakava R. Selection of Trichoderma spp. strains for the control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean // Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 2017. V. 52. № 12. P. 1140-1148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2017001200002

20. Hartman G. L., West E. D., Herman T. K. Crops that feed the World 2. Soybean-worldwide production, use, and constraints caused by pathogens and pests // Food Security. 2011. V. 3. № 1. P. 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-010-0108-x

21. O’Brien P. A. Biological control of plant diseases // Australasian Plant Pathology. 2017. V. 46. № 4. P. 293-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-017-0481-4

22. Savary S., Willocquet L., Pethybridge S. J., Esker P., McRoberts N., Nelson A. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops // Nature ecology & evolution. 2019. V. 3. № 3. P. 430-439. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y

23. Thakkar A., Saraf M. Development of microbial consortia as a biocontrol agent for effective management of fungal diseases in Glycine max L // Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection. 2015. V. 48. № 6. P. 459-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2014.893638

24. Vasebi Y., Safaie N., Alizadeh A. Biological control of soybean charcoal root rot disease using bacterial and fungal antagonists In Vitro and greenhouse condition // Journal of Crop Protection. 2013. V. 2. № 2. P. 139-150. http://journals.modares.ac.ir/article-3-9001-en.html


Login or Create
* Forgot password?