The study of bioelectric resistance (impedance) of woody plants by electrometric method under the influence of adverse factors, including oil sludge, is one of the adequate methodological approaches to assessing the state of forest biogeocenoses. The aim of the study is to study the peculiarities of the influ-ence of oil sludge pollution of soils on the duration of changes in the bioelectric resistance of the precam-bial tissue complex of birch trunks. The object of the study is the trees of the hanging birch (Betula pendu-la Roth.) growing in the basin of buffer ponds of JSC «Gazpromneft - ONPZ» (Omsk). The research area is the Central forest-steppe of the South of Western Siberia. The results of the studies were processed by standard methods of variational statistics, correla-tion, regression and variance one-factor analysis using the package Statistica 10. Comparisons of experience variants were carried out according to student and Fisher criteria. The dependence of elec-trical resistance of birch trunk PCT (precompiling complex tissues) on the level of oil sludge pollution of soils was studied. A recommendation for rapid assessment of the condition of birch trees in the con-ditions of oil sludge pollution by electrometric meth-od was developed. According to the results of our long-term studies, it can be noted that the duration of a significant negative impact of oil sludge on the electrical resistance precompiling complex tissues of birch trees in the forest-steppe zone of Western Sibe-ria is manifested within six years, and in the seventh year these differences are not reliable and already in the ninth year-these differences disappear (τfact > τ0.5). The results obtained can be used in screening studies of forest biogeocenoses and in the planning and or-ganization of bioreculture activities on the territory of sanitary protection zones of oil refineries and in areas of oil production and oil transportation.
bereza povislaya, prikambial'nyy kompleks tkaney, elektricheskoe soprotivlenie, elektrometricheskiy metod, neftyanoe zagryaznenie
1. Golodriga P. Ya., Osipov A. V. Ekspress-metod i pribory dlya diagnostiki morozoustoychivosti rasteniy // Fiziologiya i biohimiya kul'turnyh rasteniy. 1972. T. 4. Vyp. 6. S. 650-655.
2. Grigor'ev A. I. Ekologo-fiziologicheskie osnovy adaptacii drevesnyh rasteniy v lesostepi Zapadnoy Sibiri. Omsk, 2008.
3. Grigor'ev A. I. Elektroprovodnost' zheludey u derev'ev duba, razlichayuschihsya po srokam pozhelteniya i sbrasyvaniya list'ev // Materialy ІІ mezhvuzov. konf. molodyh uchenyh Volgo-Vyatskogo regiona. Yoshkar-Ola, 1973. S. 11-13.
4. Gryaz'kin A. V., Gerasyuta S. M., Bernackiy D. P., Trubacheva T. A., Kovalev N. V. Izmenchivost' velichiny impedansa drevesnyh porod // Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskoy lesotehnicheskoy akademii. 2012. Vyp. 198. S. 12-19.
5. Ivakin A. P. Ocenka zharoustoychivosti ovoschnyh kul'tur po elektricheskomu soprotivleniyu tkaney // Metody ocenki ustoychivosti rasteniy neblagopriyatnym usloviyam sredy. 1976. S. 83-86.
6. Zubkova T. A. Martynova N. A., Belousov V. M. Elektricheskoe soprotivlenie strukturnyh elementov biogeocenozov // Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011. T. 4. № 2. S. 82-89.
7. Karasev V. N., Karaseva M. A., Romanov E. M., Muhortov D. I. Termoekspress - metod ranney diagnostiki fiziologicheskogo sostoyaniya sosny obyknovennoy // Ekologiya. 2017. № 2. S. 20-27.
8. Katicheva L. A., Surova L. M., Sherstneva O. N., Bushueva A. N., Glinskaya E. V., Vodeneev V. A. Izmenenie elektricheskogo soprotivleniya plazmalemmy kletok vysshego rasteniya pri generacii variabel'nogo potenciala // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. 2013. № 3(1). S. 151-154.
9. Kashiro Yu. P. Hasanov N. H., Dorozhkin E. M. Elektricheskoe soprotivlenie tkaney prikambial'nogo komplek-sa stvola u sosny obyknovennoy i ego diagnosticheskie vozmozhnosti // Lesa Urala i hozyaystva v nih. 1988. Vyp. 14. S. 183-188.
10. Kenzhetaev G. Zh., Koybakova S. E., Syrlybekkyzy Samal. Ocenka negativnogo vozdeystviya nefti na pochvennyy pokrov // Spint Time. 2019. № 5(1)17. S. 22-24.
11. Kolovskiy R. A. Bioelektricheskaya reakciya korney seyancev kedra na ionnyy sostav sredy // Fiziologo-biohimicheskie mehanizmy rosta hvoynyh. Novosibirsk, 1978. S. 89-95.
12. Kurilo Yu. A., Grigor'ev A. I. Elektricheskoe soprotivlenie kak pokazatel' ustoychivosti drevesnyh rasteniy v usloviyah neftyanogo zagryazneniya // Problemy regional'noy ekologii. 2010. № 5. S. 111-116.
13. Kurilo Yu. A., Grigor'ev A. I. Izuchenie elektricheskogo soprotivleniya drevesnyh rasteniy v usloviyah neftyanogo zagryazneniya pochvy (na primere berezy povisloy) // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2015. № 3. S. 546.
14. Kurilo Yu. A., Grigor'ev A. I. Izuchenie vliyaniya nefteshlama na zhiznedeyatel'nost' drevesnyh rasteniy (na primere issledovaniya elektricheskogo soprotivleniya Betula pendula Roth.) // Lesovedenie. 2019. № 4. S. 304-310.
15. Kushnerenko M. D., Kurchatova G. P., Shtefyrca A. A, Pecherskaya O. N., Kievcova E. V., Bashtovaya S. I. Kom-pleksnyy metod opredeleniya zharo- i zasuhoustoychivosti rasteniy priborom «TURGOROMER-1» (T-1) // Ekspress-metody diagnostiki zharo-zasuhoustoychivosti i srokov naliva rasteniy. 1986.
16. Matorkin A. A., Karaseva M. A. Informativnost' impedansa prikambial'nogo kompleksa tkaney derev'ev hvoynyh porod pri diagnostike ih zhiznesposobnosti // Sovremennaya fiziologiya rasteniy: ot molekul do ekosistem: ma-terialy dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy konferencii. Ch. 2. Syktyvkar, 2007. S. 265-266.
17. Moskovchenko D. V., Babushkin A. G. Neftyanoe zagryaznenie poverhnostnyh vod na territorii HMAO - Yugry // Ekologiya i promyshlennost' Rossii. 2014. № 4. S. 34-38.
18. Peremitina T. O., Yaschenko I. G., Alekseeva M. N. Kompleksnaya ocenka ekologicheskih riskov avariynyh raz-livov nefti // Ekologiya i promyshlennost' Rossii. 2014. № 11. S. 22-25.
19. Polozhencev P. A., Zolotov L. A. Dinamika elektricheskogo soprotivleniya tkaney luba sosny kak indikator izmeneniya ih fiziologicheskogo sostoyaniya // Fiziologiya rasteniy. 1970. T. 17. Vyp 4. S. 830-835.
20. Skobeleva I. E., Valeev R. Sh. Antropogennoe vozdeystvie razlivov nefti na ekologicheskuyu obstanovku Za-padnoy Sibiri // Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. 2018. S. 247-250.
21. Soromotin A. V., Bordt L. V. Monitoring rastitel'nogo pokrova pri osvoenie neftegazovyh mestorozhdeniy po dannym mnogokanal'noy s'emki LANDSAT // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekologiya i priro-dopol'zovanie. 2018. T. 4. № 1. S. 37-49.
22. Tarusov B. N. Elektroprovodnost' kak metod opredeleniya zhiznesposobnosti tkani // Arhiv botanicheskih nauk. 1938. T. 52. Vyp. 2. S. 5-16.
23. Shevernozhuk R. G. Bioelektricheskaya aktivnost' eli v nasazhdeniyah, metodika ee izmereniya // Lesnoy zhurnal. 1968. № 4. S. 36-40.
24. Fisenko S. M., Fisenko M. I. Vegetacionnye variacii elektricheskogo soprotivleniya derev'ev // International scientific review. 2016. № 18(28). P. 39-43.
25. Ksenzhek O., Petrova S., Kolodyazhny M. Electrical properties of plant tissues: resistance of a maize leaf // Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2004. Vol. 30. № 3-4. P. 61-67.
26. Choudhury F. K., Devireddy A. R., Azad R. K., Shulaev V., Mittler R. Local and systemic metabolic responses during light-induced rapid systemic signaling // Plant physiology. 2018. Vol. 178. № 4. P. 1461-1472. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.01031
27. Fromm J., Lautner S. Electrical signals and their physiological significance in plants // Plant, cell & environment. 2007. Vol. 30. № 3. P. 249-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01614.x
28. Gilroy S., Białasek M., Suzuki N., Górecka M., Devireddy A. R., Karpiński S., Mittler R. ROS, calcium, and electric signals: key mediators of rapid systemic signaling in plants // Plant physiology. 2016. Vol. 171. № 3. P. 1606-1615. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.00434
29. Lew R. R. Pressure regulation of the electrical properties of growing Arabidopsis thaliana L. root hairs // Plant Physiology. 1996. Vol. 112. № 3. P. 1089-1100. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.3.1089
