The article gives a brief overview of various concepts of linguistic politeness, and discusses the dependence of this category on the type of culture.
1. Dem'yankov V.Z. Tayna dialoga // Dialog: Teoreticheskie problemy i metody issledovaniya. M., 1992.
2. Karasik V.I. Yazyk social'nogo statusa. M., 2002.
3. Larina T.V. Kategoriya vezhlivosti i stil' kommunikacii: sopostavlenie angliyskih i russkih lingvokul'turnyh tradiciy. M., 2009.
4. Slovar' po etike / Pod red. I.S.Kona. M., 1983.
5. Formanovskaya N.I. Rechevoe vzaimodeystvie: kommunikaciya i pragmatika. M., 2007.
6. Formanovskaya N.I. Rechevoy etiket i kul'tura obscheniya. M., 1989.
7. Brown P. Gender, politeness, and confrontation in Tenejapa // Discourse Processes. 1990. Vol. 13 (1).
8. Brown P., Levinson S. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, 1987.
9. Fraser B. Perspective on Politeness // Journal of Pragmatics. 1990. 14 (2).
10. Fraser B., Nolen W. The assosiation of deference with linguistic form // International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 1981. № 27.
11. Goffman E. On Face-Work: an Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction // Communication in Face-to-Face Interaction. Harmondsworth, 1972.
12. Grice H. Logic and Conversation // Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts. N.Y., 1975.
13. Huang H., Tian G. A sociolinguistic view of linguistic taboo in Chinese // International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 1990. № 81.
14. Hymes D. Models of the interaction of language and social life // Directions in sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. N.Y., 1986.
15. Lakoff R.T. Conversational Implicature // Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, 1995.
16. Lakoff R.T. Language in Context // Language. 1972. № 48.
17. Leech G. Principles of Pragmatics. L., N.Y., 1983.
18. Thomas J. Meaning in Interaction: an Introduction to Pragmatics. L., 1995.
19. Yokoyama O.T. Disbelief, lies, and manipulations in a Transactional Discourse Model // Argumentation. 1988. № 2.
