This paper tackles one central question: is there any difference between linguistic, communicative and discursive personality? The theoretical model which has been selected for the analysis is one which integrates a description of language use with an account of the social relations of the speakers.
1. Bloh M.Ya. Tekst v stanovlenii i razvitii // Stilistika i teoriya yazykovoy kommunikacii: Tezisy dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy konferencii, posvyaschennoy 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya I.R.Gal'perina. M., 2005. S. 6-9.
2. Dem'yankov V.Z. Tekst i diskurs kak terminy i kak slova obydennogo yazyka // Yazyk. Lichnost'. Tekst: Sb. statey k 70-letiyu T.M.Nikolaevoy. M., 2005. S. 34-55.
3. Karaulov Yu.N. Russkaya yazykovaya lichnost' i zadachi ee izucheniya // Yazyk i lichnost'. M., 1989.
4. Kubryakova E.S. O termine «diskurs» i stoyaschey za nim strukture znaniya // Yazyk. Lichnost'. Tekst. S. 23-33.
5. Maturana U., Varela F. Drevo poznaniya. M., 2001.
6. Plotnikova S.N. Yazykovaya, kommunikativnaya i diskursivnaya lichnost': k probleme razgranicheniya ponyatiy // Lingvistika diskursa. Irkutsk, 2005. S. 5-16.
7. Plotnikova S.N. Chelovek i personazh: Fenomenologicheskiy podhod k estestvennoy i hudozhestvennoy kommunikacii // Chelovek v kommunikacii: koncept, zhanr, diskurs. Volgograd, 2006. S. 89-104.
8. Searle J. Mind, Language and Society. Philosophy in the Real World. N.Y., 1999.
9. Widdowson H.G. Explorations in Applied Linguistics. Oxford, 1986. Part 2.
