INFLUENCE OF BACTERIAL BIOFERTILIZER ON MORPHOPHYSIOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF MUSTARD UNDER SALT STRESS
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Bacterial fertilizers are an effective technology for growing crops under saline conditions. The effect of biofertilizer (BF) based on biochar and halotolerant strain of growth-promoting rhizobacteria Pseudomonas sp. STF14 on the growth and some physiological and biochemical characteristics of salad mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern, variety “Chastushka”) under salt stress caused by sodium chloride was assessed. Mustard plants were grown in pot-scale experiment for 21 days under natural conditions. The experiment included 4 treatments: control peat soil (PS); PS + BF (2.5%, v/v); PS + NaCl (80 mM); PS + BF (2.5%, v/v) + NaCl (80 mM). From the 7th day after planting the plants were watered with a salt solution twice a week. Adding BF increased the length and fresh biomass of mustard shoots compared to the control (by 23% on average), while NaCl treatment inhibited their growth. BF added separately or together with salt increased photosynthetic pigments. Separate application of BF and NaCl led to the malondialdehyde in mustard leaves increasing by 1.4 and 1.9 times, respectively compared to the control. However, when combined, malondialdehyde decreased by 1.6 times. Watering mustard plants with a saline solution increased the content of free proline by almost 5 times and Na+ by almost 7 times, while BF + NaCl significantly reduced their amount. Thus, the use of BF under salt stress conditions contributed to the improvement of mustard growth and increased its resistance to sodium chloride.

Keywords:
Brassica juncea, Pseudomonas sp., galotolerantnye rizobakterii, biochar, hlorid natriya, parametry rosta, fotosinteticheskie pigmenty, perekisnoe okislenie lipidov, prolin
References

1. Alikulov B.S. Mehanizmy snizheniya solevogo stressa u rasteniy pri pomoschi soleustoychivyh bakteriy, vydelennyh iz galofitov // Nauchnoe obozrenie. Biologicheskie nauki. 2023. № 1. S. 98–104. https://doi.org/10.17513/srbs.1321.

2. Artamonova V.S., Ditc L.Yu., Elizarova T.N., Lyutyh I.V. Tehnogennoe zasolenie pochv i ih mikrobiologicheskaya harakteristika // Sibirskiy ekologicheskiy zhurnal. 2010. T. 3. S. 461–470.

3. Buchkina N.P., Balashov E.V., Shimanski V., Igaz D., Horak Ya. Izmenenie biologicheskih i fizicheskih parametrov pochv raznogo granulometricheskogo sostava posle vneseniya biouglya // Sel'skohozyaystvennaya biologiya. 2017. T. 52. № 3. C. 471–477. https://doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2017.3.471rus.

4. Gafurova L.A., Saidova M.E. Vliyanie pochvenno-ekologicheskih faktorov na izmenenie fermentativnoy aktivnosti zasolennyh pochv Yuzhnogo Priaral'ya // Nauchnoe obozrenie. Biologicheskie nauki. 2019. № 3. S. 5–10. https://doi.org/10.17513/srbs.1153.

5. Ivanischev V.V., Evgrashkina T., Boykova O.I., Zhukov N.N. Zasolenie pochvy i ego vliyanie na rasteniya // Izvestiya TulGU. 2020. № 3. S. 28–42.

6. Kalinkina L.G., Nazarenko L.V., Gordeeva E.E. Modificirovannyy metod vydeleniya svobodnyh aminokislot i ih opredelenie na aminokislotnom analizatore // Fiziologiya rasteniy. 1990. T. 37. № 3. S. 617–621.

7. Namestnikova O.V., Buzaeva M.V. Monitoring zasoleniya pochv v sisteme obespecheniya ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti krupnogo goroda // Sovremennye problemy grazhdanskoy zaschity. 2019. № 1 (30). S. 44–52.

8. Osipov A.V., Kolesnichenko T.V., Dimitrienko O.V. Vliyanie antropogennyh izmeneniy na biologicheskuyu aktivnost' pochv // Nauchnyy zhurnal «GLOBUS». 2021. T. 7 (64). S. 26–28.

9. Shafigullina L.R. Razlichnye aspekty primeneniya biochara // Vestnik magistratury. 2020. №5-5 (104). S. 7–10.

10. Chaganti V.N., Crohn D.M., Šimůnek J. Leaching and reclamation of a biochar and compost amended saline–sodic soil with moderate SAR reclaimed water // Agricultural Water Management. 2015. Vol. 158. P. 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.05.016.

11. Chandran H., Meena M., Swapnil P. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as a green alternative for sustainable agriculture // Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13(19). P. 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910986.

12. Drake J.A., Cavagnaro T.R., Cunningham S.C., Jackson W.R., Patti A.F. Does biochar improve establishment of tree seedlings in saline sodic soils? // Land Degradation and Development. 2016. Vol. 27. P. 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2374.

13. Glick B.R. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications // Scientifica. 2012. Vol. 5. P. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401.

14. Gul-Lalay, Ullah S., Shah S., Jamal A. Combined Effect of Biochar and Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on Physiological Responses of Canola (Brassica napus L.) Subjected to Drought Stress // Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2024. Vol. 43(6). P. 1814–1832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-11219-1.

15. Gunarathne V., Senadeera A., Gunarathne U., Biswas J.K., Almaroai Y.A., Vithanage M. Potential of biochar and organic amendments for reclamation of coastal acidic-salt affected soil // Biochar. 2020. Vol. 2 (1). P. 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-020-00036-4.

16. Hammer E.C., Balogh-Brunstad Z., Jacobsen I., Olson P.A., Step S.L., Rilling M.C. A mycorrhizal fungus grows on biochar and captures phosphorus from its surfaces // Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2014. Vol. 77. P. 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.06.012.

17. Heath R.L., Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation // Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 1968. Vol. 125. P. 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1.

18. Kaur G., Asthir B. Proline: a key player in plant abiotic stress tolerance // Biologia Plantarum. 2015. Vol. 59(4). P. 609−619. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10535-015-0549-3.

19. Kumar K.V., Singh N., Behl H.M., Srivastava S. Influence of plant growth promoting bacteria and its mutant on heavy metal toxicity in Brassica juncea grown in fly ash amended soil // Chemosphere. 2008. Vol. 72(4). P. 678–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.03.025.

20. Lichtenthaler H.K. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic membranes // Methods in Enzymology. 1987. Vol. 148. P. 350–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1.

21. Maleva M., Borisova G., Tripti, Tugbaeva A., Ahamuefule C., Salata A., Kumar A. Biofortification of pea microgreens through zinc-solubilizing bacteria inoculation with foliar iodine application // Agriculture and Forest. 2024. Vol. 70 (2). P. 123–134. https://doi.org/10.17707/AgricultForest.70.2.9.


Login or Create
* Forgot password?