The article considers the issue of bioremediation of drilling sludge. The aim of the research is studying of the microbiological processes occurring in soils based on drilling sludge, with their subsequent application for the biological stage of reclamation of disturbed lands. Microbiological characteristics of drilling sludge and four samples of soils based on it with the addition of diatomite, dolomite flour, peat, gypsum, glauconite, humic preparation “Rostock” in different proportions were studied. Crops were shown on agarized medium: meat-peptone agar (MPA), starch-ammonia agar (SAA), Munz medium, Chapek medium, depending on the determined group of microorganisms. The total number of microflora, the number of saprophytes, microorganisms growing on starch-ammonia agar (SAA), hydrocarbon-oxidizing bacteria (PSB), micromycetes and actinomycetes were estimated. The mineralization coefficient is calculated. The total number of microflora in the samples ranged from 51 to 271 million CFU/g. The share of saprophytes was 16.7–24.8% of the total amount of microflora. The proportion of microorganisms growing on SAA was 15.6-36.6%. The minimum number of PSB was 2.0 million CFU/g of soil; the maximum was 22.0 million CFU/g. The mineralization coefficient varies from 0.81 to 1.63, which indicates different rates of mineralization processes. The number of micromycetes determined on the Chapek medium ranged from 0.01 to 3.33 million CFU/g, on SAA – from 0.03 to 10.4 million CFU/g. At the same time, the number of micromycetes is much lower than the number of bacteria, which is normal for soils. The number of actinomycetes varied from 0.2 to 7.3 million CFU/g. The largest number of actinomycetes was noted when peat and humic preparation “Rostock” were introduced. The share of actinomycetes in the total number of microflora on the SAA ranged from 0.6 to 14%. There is a development of the total number of microflora, an increase in the diversity of microbocenosis, which indicates a decrease in the concentrations of water-soluble salts, petroleum products and the presence of an additional food source in the form of peat. Based on the data obtained, a conclusion was made about the possibility of using soils based on drilling sludge with the addition of peat and humic preparation “Rostock” for the reclamation of disturbed lands.
burovoy shlam, bioremediaciya, pochvogrunt, rekul'tivaciya, mikrobiologicheskiy analiz
1. Vasil'chenko A.V., Voevodina T.S. Problema ekologicheskoy ocenki zagryazneniya pochv nefteproduktami // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. №10(185). S. 147–151.
2. Ryadinskiy V.Yu., Soromotin A.V., Deneko Yu.V. Sostav i svoystva burovyh othodov Zapadnoy Sibiri // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2004. №3. S. 51–55.
3. Glazovskaya M.A., Pikovskiy Yu.I. Skorost' samoochischeniya pochv ot nefti v razlichnyh prirodnyh zonah // Priroda. 1980. №5. S. 118–119.
4. Nazarov A.V. Vliyanie neftyanogo zagryazneniya pochvy na rasteniya // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. 2007. №5(10). S. 134–141.
5. Vel'kov V.V. Bioremediaciya; principy, problemy, podhody // Biotehnologiya. 1995. №3-4. S. 20–27.
6. Grigor'yan G.R., Nikolaeva T.G., Sungatullina L.M. Izmenenie biologicheskihparametrov pochvennoy ekosistemy v agrobiocenozah v usloviyah razlichnyh sistem zemledeliya // Georesursy. 2011. №2(38). S. 9–13.
7. Senchakova T.Yu. Mikromicety chernozemnyh pochv kak ob'ekt bioindikacii v antropogenno-transformirovannyh ekosistemah // Nauka i sovremennost'. 2010. №6-1. S. 55–59.
8. Pikushova E.A., Bukreev N.A., Moskaleva S.K. Pshidatok Izmenenie chislennosti mikromicetov v chernozeme, vyschelochennom v zavisimosti ot tehnologiy vozdelyvaniya ozimoy pshenicy sorta Fortuna // Nauchnyy zhurnal KubGAU. 2012. №81. S. 459–475.
9. Sakaeva E.H., Rudakova L.V. Ocenka biologicheskoy aktivnosti tehnogruntov na osnove burovyh shlamov dlya rekul'tivacii narushennyh zemel' // Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekologiya. 2020. №4. S. 192–197.
10. Tarasova S.S. Ekologicheskaya ocenka pochvogruntov na osnove burovyh shlamov dlya biologicheskogo etapa rekul'tivacii narushennyh zemel' v usloviyah Zapadnoy Sibiri: diss… kandidat biologicheskih nauk. Tyumen', 2022. 195 s.
11. Zvyagincev D.G., Bab'eva I.P., Zenova G.M. Biologiya pochv. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 2005. 445 s.
12. Komarevceva L.G. Mikrobiologicheskaya aktivnost' pochvy na fone deystviya i posledeystviya raznyh vidov udobreniy // Vestnik APK Verhnevolzh'ya. 2010. №3. S. 43–46.
13. Habibullina F.M. Harakteristika pochvennoy mikobioty vo vtorichnyh listvennyh lesah podzony sredney taygi (Respublika Komi) // Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra RAN. 2014. №1-3. S. 891–895.
14. Nazar'ko M.D. Izmenenie sostava pochvennyh mikromicetov pri intensivnom antropogennom vozdeystvii v severnyh rayonah Kubani // Izv. vuzov. Pischevaya tehnologiya. 2007. №4. S. 110–111.
15. Kolesnikova I.Ya., Voronin L.V. Izmenenie kompleksov pochvennyh gribov pod deystviem razlichnyh sistem obrabotki pochvy i udobreniy // Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik. Estestvennye nauki. 2011. №1. S. 114–118.
16. Voronin L.V., Kolesnikova I.Ya. Iniciirovannye kompleksy pochvennyh gribov v agrocenozah // Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik. 2012. №1. T. III (Estestvennye nauki). S. 90–93.
17. Kurkina Yu.N., Nguen Thi Lan Hyong. Mikromicety v pochvah Belgorodskoy oblasti pod bobovymi kul'turami // Vestnik zaschity rasteniy. 2014. №2. S. 51–54.
18. Utobo E.B., Tewari L. Soil enzymes as bioindicators of soil ecosystem status // Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2015. Vol. 13(1). P. 147–169. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1301_147169
19. Baldrian P. Microbial enzyme-catalyzed processes in soils and their analysis // Plant Soil Environmental. 2009. №55 (9). P. 370–378. https://doi.org/10.17221/134/2009- PSE
20. Dariush M.-T., Mina K.M. Crude oil-polluted soil induces ultrastructural and enzyme activity changes in the Shoot of Lentil // Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemestry. 2017. Vol. 10. №1. P. 112–121.
