In Russia, all the regions are initially considered economically and socially complex systems that develop along the path of a huge set of conditions and processes arising in the internal and external environment. In my opinion, these types of processes should include limitations and resource opportunities, various changes in society, areas of development of the institutional area of the formation of environmental factors, processes and phenomena in the production of non-material, as well as, most importantly, of a material nature. It should be noted that the main and most important basis of the material base studied by me is the economic structure of the regional ecological system of the region, which to a greater extent characterizes stability and its ability to dynamically develop, improve the region as a whole, and its individual territories in particular, through the identification of the input flow and the values and results obtained at the output. It is important to focus attention on the fact that all economic and ecological systems in the process of their development at various stages of evolution are predominantly of the inertial type, which indicates the lack of development of a scientifically based system characterizing these states. In this regard, there are many global issues, both from a scientific point of view and from a practice-oriented direction. Thus, the author in this article examines the issues of methodological analysis and critical criteria explanation of the methodology of comprehensive assessment of the ecological state of the city of Ufa of the Republic of Bashkortostan in its close relationship with economic systems and structures.
ekologicheskoe sostoyanie goroda, ekologicheskoe sostoyanie Ufy, ekologo-ekonomicheskaya sistema regiona, ekologicheskie problemy
1. Afanas'eva Yu.A., Larin S.I., Larina N.S. Vliyanie sbrosa vysokomineralizovannyh podzemnyh vod ob'ektov rekreacionnoy deyatel'nosti na kachestvo poverhnostnyh vod // Vodnye resursy - osnova ustoychivogo razvitiya poseleniy Sibiri i Arktiki v XXI veke: Sbornik dokladov XXI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. 2019. S. 317-322.
2. Baryshnikov S.G., Botvenko E.O., Rotanova I.N. Landshaftno-kartograficheskoe obespechenie gidrologicheskih matematicheskih modeley formirovaniya stoka // Tret'i vinogradovskie chteniya. Grani gidrologii: Sbornik dokladov mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferencii. 2018. S. 690-694.
3. Belik I.S., Kamdina L.V. Vzaimosvyaz' antropogennogo vozdeystviya i kachestva zhizni naseleniya v sverdlovskoy i chelyabinskoy oblastyah // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2018. № 7 (417). S. 39-48.
4. Gorshkova A.T. Vliyanie vodohranilisch na formirovanie poverhnostnogo stoka territorii Respubliki Tatarstan // Vodoochistka. Vodopodgotovka. Vodosnabzhenie. 2019. №4 (136). S. 64-67.
5. Zamyatina M.F., D'yakov M.Yu. Resursnyy i ekologicheskiy podhody k razvitiyu regiona: opyt sravnitel'nogo analiza na primere kamchatskogo kraya // Izvestiya Russkogo geograficheskogo obschestva. 2018. T. 150. № 4S. S. 3-14.
6. Ismanova K.D., Isomadinov U.M., Zhabbarov A.M. Ispol'zovanie sovremennyh informacionnyh tehnologiy v ekonomiko-matematicheskom modelirovanii // Ekonomika i socium. 2020. №5-1(72). S. 698-703.
7. Kerimov N.I. Voprosy identifikacii, remediacii i ekonometriki prirodnyh i antropogennyh chrezvychaynyh situaciy // Problemy bezopasnosti i chrezvychaynyh situaciy. 2020. №2. S. 39-45.
8. Kochurov B.I., Blinova E.A., Ivashkina I.V. Razvitie rossiyskih gorodov posle pandemii COVID-19 // Regional'nye geosistemy. 2021. T. 45. №2. S. 183–193.
9. Kochurov B.I., Ivashkina I.V. Razvivayuschayasya ustoychivost' gorodskih landshaftov i tehnogennyh ob'ektov krupnogo goroda // Ekologiya urbanizirovannyh territoriy. 2016. №3. S. 47-53.
10. Smurov A.V. Ekologiya i ekonomika (edinstvo i protivopolozhnost') // Zhizn' Zemli. 2018. T. 40. №1. S. 4-11.
11. Suleymenova N.O. Ustoychivoe razvitie i «zelenaya ekonomika» kak osnova pravovogo razvitiya ohrany okruzhayuschey sredy Respubliki Kazahstan // Aktual'nye problemy sovremennoy yurisprudencii: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. 2017. S. 264-268.
12. Troegubov A.S., Arzamasova G.S. Perehod na risk-orientirovannoe myshlenie v sisteme ekologicheskogo menedzhmenta // Modernizaciya i nauchnye issledovaniya v transportnom komplekse. 2017. T. 1. S. 135-139.
13. Tulupov A.S., Mikaelyan A.R. Problemy vodoobespecheniya i ocenka uscherba ot zagryazneniya vodnyh istochnikov // Regional'nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki. 2018. №3 (89). S. 81-88.
14. Chekaev N.P., Galiullin A.A. Effektivnost' ispol'zovaniya mestnyh mineral'nyh resursov dlya vosproizvodstva pochvennogo plodorodiya i povysheniya produktivnosti sel'skohozyaystvennyh kul'tur // Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya agropromyshlennogo proizvodstva. Penza, 2019. S. 149-168.
15. Cauvain J. Social sustainability as a challenge for urban scholars // City. 2018. Vol. 22. №4. P. 595-603. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2018.1507113
16. Colvin R. M., Witt G. B., Lacey J. Approaches to identifying stakeholders in environmental management: Insights from practitioners to go beyond the ‘usual suspects’ // Land use policy. 2016. Vol. 52. P. 266-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.032
17. Förster J., Barkmann J., Fricke R., Hotes S., Kleyer M., Kobbe S., Wittmer H. Assessing ecosystem services for informing land-use decisions: a problem-oriented approach // Ecology and Society. 2015. Vol. 20. №3.
18. Monstadt J., Coutard O. Cities in an era of interfacing infrastructures: Politics and spatialities of the urban nexus // Urban Studies. 2019. Vol. 56. №11. P. 2191-2206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019833907
19. Morais S., Costa F. G., Pereira M. L. Heavy metals and human health // Environmental health–emerging issues and practice. 2012. Vol. 10. №1. P. 227-245.
20. Purvis B., Mao Y., Robinson D. A multi-scale integrated assessment model to support urban sustainability // Sustainability Science. 2021. P. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01080-0
