The article presents the results of a study of the practice of teachers’ professional development in the context of digitalization of education carried out in order to identify the features of teachers’ professional development and the main conceptual ideas implemented in different countries. The article examines the practice of teachers’ professional development in other countries as well as in a number of Russian regions. The analysis of pedagogical literature and scientific articles was carried out using the method of apperception and the descriptive method. The use of apperception method allowed us to expand information about the existing professional development practices implemented in different countries and regions. The use of descriptive method in working with scientific literature made it possible to select articles based on keywords, “descriptors”. In this study, the following phrases were used as descriptors: “professional development of teachers”, “concepts of professional development of teachers”, “advanced training of teachers”, “practice of professional development of teachers”. As a result, practices of teachers’ professional development have been identified that have both similar conceptual ideas and some national or regional features. Two of the conceptual ideas reflected in almost all countries are particularly noteworthy: that of continuity and that of personalization of teachers’ professional development in the context of education digitalization. Implementation of these ideas makes it possible to ensure continuous professional development of a teacher taking into account his or her professional experience, expertise, professional competencies and interests, as well as the interests and demands of the educational organization in which he or she works. The implementation of these ideas is carried out through integration of formal and non-formal education, as well as through self-education and self-development of teachers in the context of education digitalization.
konceptual'nye idei, professional'noe razvitie, povyshenie kvalifikacii, cifrovizaciya, cifrovaya obrazovatel'naya sreda
1. Guskey T. R. Professional development and teacher change // Teachers and teaching. 2002. Vol. 8. № 3. P. 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
2. Speck M., Knipe C. (ed.). Why Can′ t We Get It Right?: Designing High-Quality Professional Development for Standards-Based Schools. Corwin Press, 2005.
3. Lam B. H. Teacher professional development in Hong Kong: compared on anglosphere: the role of Confucian philosophy. 2015. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.521
4. Gracheva L.Yu., Bagramyan E.R., Cygankova M.N., Dugarova T.C., Sheveleva N.N. Modeli i praktiki professional'nogo razvitiya uchiteley v zarubezhnyh sistemah obrazovaniya // Obrazovanie i nauka. 2020. T. 22. № 6. S. 176-200. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-6-176-200
5. Gevorkyan E.N., Ioffe A.N., Shalashova M. M. Povyshenie kvalifikacii pedagogov: podhody i akcenty rezul'tativnosti // Pedagogika. 2018. № 6. S. 70-76.
6. Sheveleva N.N., Chernobay E.V. Razvitie uchitel'skogo potenciala // Pedagogika. 2018. № 10. S. 95-103.
7. Antonov N. V., Ivanova O. A., Bocharova N. V. Osobennosti postroeniya individual'noy traektorii professional'nogo razvitiya pedagogov // Obrazovanie. Nauka. Nauchnye kadry. 2018. № 1. S. 205-209.
8. Mitina L.M. Psihologiya truda i professional'nogo razvitiya uchitelya. M.: Akademiya, 2004. 318 s.
9. Ivanova O.A., Antonov N.V. Professional'noerazvitiepedagogov v usloviyah obrazovatel'noy organizacii // Vestnik Nizhnevartovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2019. № 1. S. 51-57.
10. Uvarov A.Yu., Geybl E., Dvoreckaya I.V. Trudnosti i perspektivy cifrovoy transformacii obrazovaniya. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom Vysshey shk. ekonomiki, 2019. 343 s.
11. Vayndorf-Sysoeva M.E., Subocheva M.L. Cifrovoe obuchenie v kontekste sovremennogo obrazovaniya: praktika primeneniya. M.: Diona, 2020. 244 s.
12. Dautova O.B., Vershinina N. A., Ermolaeva M.G., Ignat'eva E.Yu., Krylova O.N., Surtaeva N.N., Shilova O.N., Hristoforov S.V. Pedagogicheskiy slovar': Noveyshiy etap razvitiya terminologii. SPb: KARO, 2020. 328 s.
13. Mahotin D.A., Sheveleva N.N., Lesin S.M., Suvirova A.Yu. Nepreryvnost' professional'nogo razvitiya pedagogov v zarubezhnyh stranah // Innovacionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii. 2019. № 5(65). S. 61-69.
14. Lyan'cen' V. Sistema pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya v Rossii i KNR na sovremennom etape: strukturno-soderzhatel'nyy aspekt // Al'manah sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2012. № 9. S. 36-38.
15. Hargreaves E., Berry R., Lai Y.C., Leung P., Scott D., Stobart G. Teachers’ experiences of autonomy in continuing professional development: Teacher learning communities in London and Hong Kong //Teacher development. 2013. Vol. 17. № 1. P. 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2012.748686
16. Bautista, A., Wong, J., & Gopinathan, S. (2015). Desarrollo profesional docente en Singapur: Describiendo el Panorama // Psychology, Society and Education, Vol. 7. № 3. P. 423-441. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.523
17. Korhonen T., Lavonen J., Kukkonen M., Sormunen K., Juuti K. The Innovative School as an Environment for the Design of Educational Innovations // Finnish Innovations and Technologies in Schools. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-749-0_9
18. Sheveleva N. N. Sovremennye tehnologii i formy professional'nogo razvitiya uchitelya // Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka. 2017. № 4. S. 79-81.
19. Smirnova S. V. Novye podhody k organizacii adresnogo professional'nogo razvitiya rabotnikov obrazovaniya Novosibirskoy oblasti // Tendencii razvitiya obrazovaniya: kto i chemu uchit uchiteley. 2017. S. 135-145.
