The openness of a modern university ensures that students from heterogeneous groups are included in education. Academic mobility is a significant trend in the global educational space. The success of the education of students with disabilities is determined by their personal readiness to be active and academically mobile. The authors note a tendency towards the implementation of academic mobility in the process of professional training mainly through the creation of external conditions. At the same time, insufficient attention is paid to the analysis of mobility as a personal education, which determines the weak provision of the mechanisms of its formation, especially among students with disabilities. The purpose of this study is to analyze the personal indicators of academic mobility of students with disabilities based on respondents' portfolios containing information about the facts of academic mobility in the experience of students, a survey about the perceptions and motivation of respondents to implement academic mobility, the Tomsk Rigidity Questionnaire G.V. Zalevsky. The results obtained indicate the low activity of students in educational, scientific activities that go beyond the educational program. At the same time, more than half of the respondents are ready for academic mobility. Comparative analysis of the studied components in the samples of students with health standards and with disabilities showed: lack of expression of rigidity in students with disabilities; correlations between the characteristics of rigidity and disability features; the severity of the components of personal readiness for academic mobility among students with disabilities. The presented results are unique and prove the importance of inclusive transformation of the educational space of universities to ensure the possibility of learning and academic mobility of students of heterogeneous groups.
professional'naya podgotovka, vysshee obrazovanie, akademicheskaya mobil'nost', student, invalidnost', rigidnost', otkrytost', fleksibil'nost', lichnostnye indikatory
1. Volosnikova L.M. Akademicheskaya mobil'nost' kak konstitucionno-pravovaya kategoriya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2010. №4. S. 86–87.
2. Volosnikova L.M., Fedina L.V., Kukuev E.A., Patrusheva I.V., Ogorodnova O.V. Akademicheskaya mobil'nost' dlya vseh: mezhdu videniem i real'nost'yu // Psihologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya. 2019. T. 11. №3. C. 26–43. https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2019110303
3. Vygotskiy L.S. Osnovy defektologii. SPb. 2003. 654 s.
4. Galazhinskiy E.V. Psihicheskaya rigidnost' kak integral'nyy pokazatel' stepeni otkrytosti psihologicheskoy sistemy (v kontekste problemy samorealizacii lichnosti) // Sibirskiy psihologicheskiy zhurnal. 2001. №14-15. S. 48–53.
5. Galichin V.A. Akademicheskaya mobil'nost' v usloviyah internacionalizacii obrazovaniya. M., 2009. 460 s.
6. Dmitrieva N.K. Academic mobility development in the process of professionally oriented foreign language teaching // Uchenye zapiski Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Obschestvennye i gumanitarnye nauki. 2012. T. 2. №7(128). S. 46–48.
7. Zhivaeva Yu.V., Stoyanova E.I., Loginova I.O. Harakteristiki proyavleniya kontinuuma rigidnost' – fleksibil'nost' studentov, obuchayuschihsya v raznoy sociokul'turnoy srede // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental'nyh issledovaniy. 2016. №11-2. S. 318–322.
8. Zagvyazinskiy V.I., Volosnikova L.M., Kukuev E.A., Patrusheva I.V. Akademicheskaya mobil'nost' v pedagogicheskom obrazovanii // Obrazovanie i nauka. 2020. T. 22. №6. S. 31–48. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-6-31-48
9. Zalevskiy G.V. Fiksirovannye formy povedeniya individual'nyh i gruppovyh sistem (v kul'ture, obrazovanii, nauke, v norme i patologii). M.; Tomsk, 2004. 460 s.
10. Ibragimova L.A., Yusupova Yu.M. Suschnost' i struktura socializacii detey mladshego shkol'nogo vozrasta v processe inklyuzivnogo obrazovaniya // Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psihologiya. 2020. №5. T. 8. https://mir-nauki.com/75PDMN520.html
11. Ibragimova L.A., Novikova E.A. Podgotovka bakalavrov k professional'noy deyatel'nosti v inklyuzivnom obrazovanii: teoreticheskiy aspekt // Vestnik Nizhnevartovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2019. №4. S. 78–83. https://doi.org/10.36906/2311-4444/19-4/11
12. Klochko V.E. Samoorganizaciya v psihologicheskih sistemah: problemy stanovleniya mental'nogo prostranstva lichnosti. Vvedenie v transspektivnyy analiz. Tomsk, 2005. 174 s.
13. Kravcova N.A., Dovzhenko A.Yu., Galkina D.A. Psihicheskaya rigidnost' u studentov medicinskogo vuza // Aktual'nye problemy psihologii i pedagogiki: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. Orenburg. 2016. S. 339–345.
14. Kudinov S.I., Kudinov S.S. Psihologicheskie osobennosti samorealizacii lichnosti s ogranichennymi fizicheskimi vozmozhnostyami // Sibirskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal. 2010. №5. S. 272–279.
15. Kuznecov A.Yu., Vershinina E.V. Faktory razvitiya i transformacii akademicheskoy mobil'nosti // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2017. №10. S. 144–148.
16. Luk'yanov O.V. Problema stanovleniya identichnosti v epohu social'nyh izmeneniy. Tomsk, 2008. 212 s.
17. Kozlov V. V., Morozova E. V., Shabalina N. B. Sub'ektivnoe otnoshenie k invalidnosti u pacientov v processe prohozhdeniya mediko-social'noy ekspertizy // Sed'maya volna psihologii: Sb. nauchn. st. Vyp. 2. Yaroslavl'; Minsk, 2007. S. 143–154.
18. Popov L.V. Akademicheskaya mobil'nost'. Izmereniya i ocenki // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 20: Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie. 2017. №2. S. 49–59.
19. Solov'eva N.A. Psihologiya invalidnosti. Yaroslavl', 2004. 47 s.
20. Byram M., Dervin F. (ed.). Students, staff and academic mobility in higher education. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009.
21. Jan van der Boon. Delivering talent: Careers of researchers inside and outside academia // League of European Research Universities (LERU). 2018.
22. Lawton W., Katsomitros A. International branch campuses // Data Dev. Lond. Obs. Borderless High. Educ. 2012.
23. Leask B. Using formal and informal curricula to improve interactions between home and international students // Journal of studies in international education. 2009. Vol. 13. №2. P. 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1028315308329786
24. Nosek M.A., Taylor H.B., Hughes R.B., Taylor P. Disability, psychosocial, and demographic characteristics of abused women with physical disabilities // Violence Against Women. 2006. No. 12. P. 838–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206292671
25. Papatsiba V. Student mobility in Europe: An academic, cultural and mental journey? Some conceptual reflections and empirical findings // International Relations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3628(05)03003-0
26. Pieters D., Schoukens P. Improving the social security of internationally mobile researchers league of European research universities // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011. Vol. 13. P. 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.004
27. Teichler U. Temporary study abroad: The life of ERASMUS students // European Journal of education. 2004. Vol. 39. №4. P. 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2004.00193.x
