The business communication culture is an inalienable aspect of the professional activity of military personnel. The analysis of the essence and content of the business communication culture demonstrated by military students revealed some gaps in the development of this academic discipline in the military universities of the Russian Federation. The need to study this problem is acquiring scientific topicality and practical importance. The military service persons are more actively involved into business activities now but their level of preparedness to conduct business communication in the social and service sphere is rather low. Scientific and practical solutions to this contradiction can become an important component in the general program of transformations in the training of military specialists and further research. This research aimed to determine the conditions for the effective functioning of the process of forming a business communication culture among students of military universities. The practical task of the research was to form a business communication culture and to actualize the process of its formation among students of military universities. To solve the task, theoretical methods were used such as analysis of thesis research; comparative analysis of philosophical, sociological, psychological and pedagogical literature; and study and generalization of advanced pedagogical experience. The methodological basis was a set of basic approaches, namely, systemic, activity-based, axiological, and cultural. The study showed that the effectiveness of the process of forming a business communication culture is ensured by the implementation of a framework of pedagogical conditions, which was developed in this study, and is determined by the selected research methodology and the peculiarities of the studied phenomenon, i.e. the business communication culture of military students.
professional'naya deyatel'nost', pedagogicheskie usloviya, kursanty voennyh vuzov, kul'tura delovogo obscheniya
1. Bol'shoy enciklopedicheskiy slovar'. M.; SPb., 1993. S. 669.
2. Borytko N.M. V prostranstve vospitatel'noy deyatel'nosti. Volgograd, 2001. S. 181.
3. Vachkov I.V. Osnovy tehnologii gruppovogo treninga. M., 1999. S. 153.
4. Emel'yanov O.A. Pedagogicheskaya profilaktika deviantnogo povedeniya voennosluzhaschih vnutrennih voysk i obespechenie nadezhnosti professional'noy deyatel'nosti // Gumanitarnye nauchnye issledovaniya. 2012. №3(7). C. 2.
5. Zerkalina A.R. Kul'tura delovogo obscheniya kak social'no-pedagogicheskaya problema // Zhurnal nauchnyh publikaciy aspirantov i doktorantov. 2014. №2 (92). S. 266–270.
6. Kupach T.Yu., Mashin V.N., Grigorov A.Yu. Social'no-kul'turnaya deyatel'nost' kursantov vysshih voennyh aviacionnyh obrazovatel'nyh uchrezhdeniy i ee vospitatel'nyy potencial // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. 2014. T. 10. № 5-2. S. 233–236.
7. Leont'ev A.A. Pedagogicheskoe obschenie. M., 1979. S. 46.
8. Muraev N.P. Pedagogicheskaya suschnost', soderzhanie i struktura processa formirovaniya osnov professional'noy kul'tury kursantov // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2014. № 1. S. 184–185.
9. Pankratov V.N. Manipulyacii v obschenii i ih neytralizaciya M., 2001. S. 58–82.
10. Pahal'yan V.E. Gruppovoy psihologicheskiy trening. SPb., 2006. S. 224.
11. Prutchenkov A.S. Social'no-psihologicheskiy trening v shkole. M., 2001. S. 144.
12. Samedova Yu.A. Gosudarstvenno-patrioticheskoe vospitanie kursantov voennyh vuzov // Psihologo-pedagogicheskie voprosy voenno-professional'noy deyatel'nosti. 2015. № 4.
13. Safonov I.A. Etapy stanovleniya problemy formirovaniya proektno-tehnologicheskoy kul'tury kursantov voennyh vuzov // Mir pedagogiki i psihologii. 2019. № 2 (31). S. 39–45.
14. Suslova E.A. Razvitie social'no-perceptivnoy kompetentnosti v sisteme professional'nogo obscheniya // Razvitie social'no-perceptivnoy kompetencii lichnosti: Materialy nauchnoy sessii, posvyaschennoy 75-letiyu akademika A.A. Bodaleva. M., 1998. S. 248.
15. Uvarina N.V. Principy aktualizacii tvorcheskogo potenciala lichnosti v obrazovatel'nom processe // Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka. 2012. № 12. S. 73–76.
16. Shvachko E.V., Duranov M.E. Koncepciya kak instrument izucheniya sociokul'turnyh problem obrazovaniya i razvitiya lichnosti // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv. 2012. №6(50). S. 200–206.
17. Augusti G. Quality and accreditation in engineering education in Europe //Proceedings. International Symposium on Innovation and Quality in Engineering Education. Valladolid (Spain). 2012. P. 26–28.
18. Kauffman D. et al. Lost at Sea: Without a Curriculum, Navigating Instruction Can be Tough--Especially for New Teachers // American Educator. 2002. Vol. 26. №2. P. 6.
19. Ruenzel D. Once more, with feeling // Teacher magazine. 2002. P. 3–12.
20. Donald Mc. Cabe. Cheating, Why Student Do It and How We Can Help Them Stop // American Educator. 2001. Winter. P. 1–7.
21. Ehlers A. Inklusion, Selbstbestimmung und Partizipation als Qualitȁtsmerkmale von Bildung: Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Gradeseines Doktors der Philosophi. Koblenz Landau, 2009. P. 25.
22. Hughes C. New times? New learners? New voices? Towards a contemporary social theory of learning // British Journal of Sociology of Education. 2004. Vol. 25. №3. P. 395-408.
23. Marie Winn. What Television Chases Out Of Life // American Educator. 2002. Summer. P. 7–12.
