The active development of digital technologies has had a significant impact on the educational process. Higher education institutions en masse switch to distance learning courses, vlogs, video hosting, popular science educational platforms. All of these platforms provide lectures in various branches of knowledge, regardless the curriculum, level of education, or even professional orientation. The development of modern media formats implies the possibility of active interaction with content. Can the format of video lecture meet these requirements? Or does the content consumer remain passive and can’t influence anything? How long will such training format exist, and what are its prospects? In such rapidly changing conditions of life, the skills of flexibility and adaptation are applied to the educational process and teaching formats likewise. To improve the efficiency of work, everyone, including teachers, lecturers and students, needs to quickly adjust and adapt. The authors of the article attempted to explore the popularity and effectiveness of video lectures, identify the problems related to this form of teaching, and offer some possible solutions to create an educational model of online interaction that would promote the development of communication and learning skills.
elektronnoe obuchenie, onlayn-obuchenie, cifrovoe vospitanie, informacionno-obuchayuschaya sreda vuza, kommunikativnye tehnologii, praktiko-lichnostno-orientirovannaya model', videolekciya
1. Bykova N.N. Motivaciya obuchayuschihsya pri primenenii distancionnyh obrazovatel'nyh tehnologiy // Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina. 2016. №4-2. S. 40–45.
2. Dzhenkova E.A. Pragmalingvisticheskie harakteristiki deritualizacii nauchnogo diskursa (na primere Shnobelevskoy nauchnoy antipremii) // Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2017. №10 (123). S. 112–117.
3. Ivanova T.S. Rechevoe povedenie internet-obscheniya // Vestnik Adygeyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Filologiya i iskusstvovedenie. 2011. №3. S. 132–136.
4. Kobzeva E.V. Polikodovyy tekst kak ob'ekt filologicheskogo analiza // Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2017. №10 (123). S. 58–62.
5. Karnyushina V.V., Variyasova E.V. Lingvisticheskiy vzglyad na innovacii v obrazovanii: stand-up lekcii na sayte TED // Innovacionnost' i mul'tikompetentnost' v prepodavanii i izuchenii inostrannyh yazykov: Sb. nauch. tr. M., 2017. S. 62–67.
6. Karnyushina V.V., Variyasova E.V, Ivanova E.A. Sintaksicheskie i foneticheskie sredstva formirovaniya emocional'nogo nastroya i intimizacii obscheniya v lekciyah TED: taktiki rechevogo vozdeystviya // Kommunikativnye issledovaniya. Omsk, 2018. №4 (18). S. 235–251.
7. Karnyushina V.V., Variyasova E.V, Ivanova E.A. Spiker ili lektor: vliyanie sovremennyh mediynyh sredstv na rechevoe povedenie prepodavatelya vysshey shkoly // Russkiy yazyk v global'nom i lokal'nom izmereniyah: Sb. st. Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. Surgut, 23–24 noyabrya 2018 g.) / Otv. red. T.A. Sirotkina. Surgut, 2018. S. 339–344.
8. Kisluhina I.A. Ispol'zovanie distancionnyh obrazovatel'nyh tehnologiy v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya: problemy i perspektivy // Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal. 2017. № 9 (103).
9. Kitaygorodskaya G.A. Metodicheskie osnovy intensivnogo obucheniya inostrannym yazykam. M., 2016. 85 s.
10. Korotaeva E.V. O vzaimodeystvii sub'ektov v distancionnoy forme obucheniya // Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii. 2014. №3. S. 68–73.
11. Robotova A.S. Sovremennyy pedagogicheskiy diskurs // Universum: Vestnik Gercenovskogo universiteta. 2008. № 12. S. 19–25.
12. Tyunnikov Yu.S., Maznichenko M.A. Analiz innovacionnoy deyatel'nosti obscheobrazovatel'nogo uchrezhdeniya: scenariy, podhod // Standarty i monitoring v obrazovanii. 2014. № 5. S. 8–18.
13. Federal'nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel'nyy standart vysshego obrazovaniya (FGOS VO) Rossiyskoy Federacii. № 50358 ot 15 marta 2018 goda. http://fgosvo.ru/fgosvo/151/150/24/94
14. Shishlina N.V. Avtor elektronnogo kursa: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. Izhevsk, 2014. 70 s.
15. Hansch A., Hillers L., McConachie K., Newman C., Schildhauer T., Schmidt J.P. Video and Online Learning: Critical Reflections and Findings from the Field (March 13, 2015) // HIIG Discussion Paper Series No. 2015-02. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2577882
16. McConachie K., Schmidt P. Why there are so many video lectures in online learning, and why there probably shouldn’t be //Medium. MIT Medial Lab. 2015. Vol. 17.
