The study is aimed at identifying and analyzing the determinants of effective pedagogical education for future university teachers. Research interest in this issue stems from world wide dramatic changes in higher education caused by interdependent processes of globalization, massification and digitalization, which in turn foregrounds the problem of effective teaching in a more diverse and complex university environment. The research is based on both theoretical analysis and comparison of modern approaches to the problem under study, generalization of pedagogical experience and empirical investigation. The authors focused on students’ expectations and perceptions regarding real and ideal university teachers. Data collection involved the qualitative approach with the use of focus group method as well as focused interviews. The findings obtained helped to substantiate key determinants of effective pedagogical education for future university teachers, namely an opportune content and teaching methods updating, relevant forms of training, consideration of students’ expectations. The results of the research are of interest to a wide range of experts in the field of higher education and can be applied within the courses of “Pedagogy of Higher Education”, “Pedagogy and Psychology of Higher Education”, “Methods of Teaching at the University”, etc.
prepodavatel' vuza, pedagogicheskaya podgotovka, pedagogika vysshey shkoly, imidzh prepodavatelya vuza, interaktivnye metody obucheniya
1. Albakova, Z. A.-M. (2015). The Student Image of the Teacher of the Higher School of the XXI Century. Akmeologiya, (3(55)), 25-26. (In Russian).
2. Ermolova, T. V., & Litvinov, A. V. (2014). On the Question of Pedagogical Aspects of Education through Computer and Internet Technologies (Following the Foreign Studies). Russian Scientific Journal, (3(41)), 100-106. (In Russian).
3. Zaslavskaya, O. V., & Salnikova, O. E. (2018). The Formation of Professional (Teaching) Personality of Teacher of Higher School: A Review of the Scientific Literature. Izvestiya Tula State University, (4), 49-56. (In Russian).
4. Ibragimova, L. A., & Skobeleva, I. E. (2017). Electronic Learning Resources as a Main Element in Providing High-Quality Training for the Future Experts of the Secondary Professionals Education. Bulletin of Nizhnevartovsk State University, (3), 16-20. (In Russian).
5. Ivanova, G. P., Logvinova, O. K., & Shirkova, N. N. (2018). Pedagogical Support of Foreign Students’ Sociocultural Adjustment: The Experience of Implementation. Higher Education in Russia, (27(3)), 60-69. (In Russian).
6. Ivleva, M. L., & Saenko, N. R. (2016). Features of the Application of the Case Method in the Course “Pedagogy and Psychology of Higher Education” for PhD Students. Universities for Tourism and Service Association Bulletin, (2(10)), 59-67. (In Russian).
7. Kozlova, N. I. (2010). System-forming Role of Pedagogical Knowledge in Professional Training of a Higher School Teacher. Uchenye zapiski Zabaikal'skogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. N. G. Chernyshevskogo, (5(34)), 37- 44. (In Russian).
8. Martynenko, A. V. (2019). University Teacher: Modern Challenges, Inconsistency and Prospects of the Profession. Simbirskii nauchnyi vestnik, (3(37)), 19-24. (In Russian).
9. Mitrofanova, K. A., & Penkova, E. A. (2015). Competency-Based Approach in Higher Education: Training Teaching Staff. Innovation in Education, (6), 50-60. (In Russian).
10. Rozov, N. Kh. (2014). Timeless Appeal of the Teaching Profession. Higher Education in Russia, (12), 26-35. (In Russian).
11. Rozov, N. Kh. (2016). A Profession is a Teacher. The Moscow University Bulletin. Series 20. Pedagogical Education, (2), 3-9. (In Russian).
12. Senashenko, V. S. (2017). On the Prestige of the University Teacher Profession, Postgraduate Academic Degrees and Titles. Higher Education in Russia, (2), 36-44. (In Russian).
13. Sadovnichy, V. A. (2017). Universitety v evraziiskom obrazovatel'nom prostranstve. Moscow. (In Russian).
14. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice (2009). New York & London.
15. Altbach, P. G., & De Wit, H. (2020). Postpandemic outlook for higher education is bleakest for the poorest. International Higher Education, 102, 3-5.
16. Blondeau, N. (2017). “Pedagogie universitaire”: de quoi parle-t-on? Academia, (8), 76-94. (In French). https://doi.org/10.26220/aca.2795
17. Henard, F., & Roseveare, D. (2012). Fostering Quality Teaching in Higher Education: Policies and Practices. OECD Publishing, https://clck.ru/Qg9KT
18. Knobel, M. (2015). Sustaining Quality and Massification: Is It Possible? International Higher Education, (80), 9-10. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2015.80.6136
19. McKeachie, W. J., & Svinick, M. (2006). McKeachie’s Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers. Boston.
20. Mercader, C., & Gairin, J. (2020). University Teachers’ Perception of Barriers to the Use of Digital Technologies: The Importance of the Academic Discipline. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, (4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0182-x
21. Safronova, V., & Klyukina, E. (2020). The Image of Modern University Teacher: Studying the Student Perceptions. Rural Environment. Education. Personality. (REEP) Proceedings of the 13th International Scientific Conference, (13), 134-141. https://doi.org/10.22616/REEP.2019.020
22. Sajjad, S. (2010). Effective teaching methods at higher education level. Pakistan Journal of Special Education, 11, 29-43.
23. Veiga-Simão, A-M., Flores, M-A., Barros, A., Fernandes S., & Mesquita, D. (2015). Perceptions of University Teachers about Teaching and the Quality of Pedagogy in Higher Education: A Study in Portugal. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, (38(1)), 102-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2014.996408
24. Vlkova, I. (2019) Minimum Pedagogical Education for University Teachers. In EDULEARN19 Proceedings, 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (Palma, 1-3 July 2019), Palma. 7813-7818. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.1899
25. Yakovleva, N. O., & Yakovlev, E. V. (2014). Interactive Teaching Methods in Contemporary Higher Education. Pacific Science Review, (16), 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscr.2014.08.016
