In transition from antiquity to the Middle Ages an important role was played by the sphere of education, high school in particular. It became one of the most important links of the cultural continuity between the epochs, ensuring translation of knowledge and classical heritage. High School of Early Byzantium comprised three levels: grammar, rhetoric, and philosophy. Special sciences, first of all medicine and jurisprudence, corresponded to the level of rhetoric. Christian theology was considered superior to philosophy, though it was not common, but intra- church. In general, higher education in Early Byzantium remained secular in the Christianized society. Even the content of teaching remained predominantly traditional classical, excluding pagan theurgic practices. The school of Iamblichus in Apamea became one of the first philosophical schools of Late Antiquity, where, in addition to studying Neoplatonism, a complex of theurgic practices emerged as a religious cult expression of the final phase of the existence of the classical philosophical higher school. Iamblichus (about 250-320 A.D.) was a key figure in the translation of Neoplatonism from Rome to the Eastern Mediterranean, the future Byzantium.
Pozdnyaya Antichnost', Rannyaya Vizantiya, shkola, Yamvlih, filosofiya, sholarh, prepodavateli, studenty
1. Afonasin E. V. 2010. Yamvlih Halkidskiy. Izdaniya i perevody // ΣΧΟΛΗ. Filosofskoe antikovedenie i klassicheskaya tradiciya 4.2, 256-259.
2. Afonasin E. V.2009. Yamvlih v Afinah // Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina. Seriya: Filosofiya. № 4. T. 1, 26-35.
3. Bolgova A.M. 2016. Zhenschiny-filosofy v tradicii shkol'nogo neoplatonizma Ranney Vizantii: Sosipatra // Bolgov N. N. (otv. red.) Kondakovskie chteniya - V. Antichnost' - Vizantiya - Drevnyaya Rus': sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferencii. Belgorod: NIU «BelGU», 88-94.
4. Kobzeva A. V. 2017. «Hronografiya» Ioanna Malaly: antikvarnaya tradiciya i medievalizaciya istoricheskogo znaniya v Ranney Vizantii. Avtoref. diss. … kand. ist. nauk. Belgorod.
5. Mesyac S. V. 2008a. Bozhestvennyy Yamvlih: vehi zemnogo puti // Dialog so vremenem 22, 65-79.
6. Mesyac S. V.2008 b. Yamvlih // Antichnaya filosofiya: Enciklopedicheskiy slovar'. M.: Nauka, 837-848.
7. Petrov A. V. 2003. Fenomen teurgii: Vzaimodeystvie yazycheskoy filosofii i religioznoy praktiki v ellinistichesko-rimskiy period. SPb.: RHGI; ID SPbGU.
8. Petrov V. V. 2008. Σύμβολα i συνθήματα v teurgicheskom neoplatonizme Yamvliha i Prokla // Dialog so vremenem 24, 148-166.
9. Aeneas Gaz. Theophr.: Aeneas of Gaza. 2012. Theophrastus with Zacharias of Mytilene: Ammonius / Gertz S., Dillon J., Russell D. (ed.). London: Hardback.
10. Ammon. In Anal. Prior. CAG: Ammonius. On Aristotle Categories. 1991. / Cohen S.M., Matthews G.B. (trans.). London, Ithaca, New York: Duckworth and Cornell University Press.
11. Athanassiadi Polymnia. 1993. Dreams, Theurgy and Freelance Divination: The Testimony of Iamblichus // Journal of Roman Studies 83, 115-130.
12. Balty Janine. 1984. Apamée de Syrie: bilan des recherchesarchéologiques 1973-1979; aspects de l’architecturedomestiqued’Apamée. Bruxelles: BP.
13. Barnes T. W. 1978. A Correspondent of Iarnblichus // Greek, Roman, and Byzantim Studies 19, 99-106.
14. Beutler R. 1953. Porphyrios 21 // // Pauly - Wissowa.Realencyklopädie der classischenAltertumswissenschaft. Vol. XXII, Sec. 1. Stuttgart, 300-302.
15. Bidez J. 1919. Le Philosophe Jambliqueet son ecole // Revue des Etudes Grecques 32, 29-40.
16. Blumenthal H. J., Clark E. G. 1993. The Divine Iamblichus: Philosopher and Man of Gods. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.
17. Bowersock G. 2002. Chalcis ad Belum and Anasartha in Byzantine Syria // Melanges Gilbert Dagron. Paris: Le Belle Lettres, 47-55.
18. Cameron A.1967. Iamblichus at Athens // Athenaeum. N.S. 45, 143-153.
19. Cameron Alan. 1968. The Date of Iamblichus' Birth // Hermes 96, 374-376.
20. De mysteriis: Jamblique. 2003. Les Mystères d’Egypte. Raris: Belles Lettres.
21. Dillon J. 1987. Iamblichus of Chalkis // Aufstieg und Niedergang der Roemischen Welt II. 36:2, 868-909.
22. Dillon J., Polleichtner W. 2009. Iamblichus of Chalcis. The Letters. Atlanta: Scholars Press.
23. Dillon J.1973. Iamblichi Chalcidensis in Platonisdia logos commentariorum fragmenta // Philosophia Antiqua 23, 34-45.
24. Diog. Laert.: Diogen Laertskiy. O zhizni, ucheniyah i izrecheniyah znamenityh filosofov. 1979. / Gasparov M.L. (prim., per.), Losev A.F. (vstup. st., red.). M.: Mysl'.
25. Dunn M. 1976. Iamblichus, Thrasyllus and the Reading Order of the Platonic Dialogues // The Significance of Neoplatonism / ed. by R.B. Harris. Norfolk, Va.: International Society for Neoplatonic Studies, 59-80.
26. Fowden G. 1982. The Pagan Holy Man in Late Antique Society // Journal of Hellenic Studies 102, 41-49.
27. Giangrande G. 1954. Contributia dunaedizioned elle Vitae Sophistarum di Eunapio // Rendiconti dell'Istituto Lombardo. Classe di scienze e lettere 9, 316-317.
28. In Porph. Isag.: David the Invincible Commentary on Porphyry’s Isagoge: Old Armenian Text With the Greek Original, an English Translation, Introduction and Notes. 2014. / Muradyan G. (ed.). Leiden: Brill Academic Publ.
29. Larsen B. D. 1972. Jamblique de Chalcis: Exuguteet philosophe. Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget.
30. Larsen B. D. 1975. La Place de Jambliquedans la Philosophie antique tardive // Entretiens sur l'antiquite classique. Vol. 21: De Jambliquea Proclus. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 1-30.
31. Leadbetter L. W. 1971. Aspects of the Philosophical Priesthood in Iamblichus’ De Mysteriis // Classical Bulletin 47, 89-92.
32. Lib. Or.: Libanius (Libanios). Opera Omnia. 1927. / Foerster R. (ed.). Vol. XIII. Leipzig: Teubner.
33. Marin., Vita Procl.: Neoplatonic Saints. The Lives of Plotinus and Proclus by their Students. 2000. / Edwards M. (ed.). Liverpool: University Press.
34. O'Meara, Dominic J. 2003. Platonopolis. Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
35. Penella R. J. 1990. Greek Philosophers and Sophists in the Fourth Century A.D. Studies in Eunapius of Sardis. Leeds: Peeters.
36. Phenix R. R. 2008.The Sermons of Joseph of Balai of Qenneshrin.Rhetoric and Interpretation in Fifth-Century Syriac Literature. Tubingen: Verlag Univ.
37. Philostr., Vita Apol: Flaviy Filostrat. Zhizn' Apolloniya Tianskogo. 1985. M.: Nauka.
38. PLRE 1: PLRE I: Martindale J.R. The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire. 1980. Vol. I. A.D. 260-395. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Plut., Coniug. praec.: Plutarchi Moralia. 1974. Vol. 1 / Paton W.R., Wegehaupt I., Pohlenz M., Gärtner H. (ed.). Leipzig: Teubner.
40. Porph. V. Plot.: Neoplatonic Saints. The Lives of Plotinus and Proclus by their Students. 2000. / Edwards M. (ed.). Liverpool: University Press.
41. Ps.-Jul. Ep.: L’empereur Julien. 2003. / Bidez J (ed.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
42. Raubitschek A. E. 1964. Iamblichos at Athens // Hesperia 33, 63-68.
43. Saffrey H. D. 1971. Abammon, pseudonyme de Jamblique // Philomathes: Studies and Essays in the Humanities in Memory of Philip Merlin. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 227-239.
44. Shaw G. 1988. Theurgy as Demiurgy: Iamblichus' Solution to the Problem of Embodiment // Dionysius 12, 37-60.
45. Shaw G. 1995. Theurgy and the soul: the neoplatonism of Iamblichus. Pennsilvania University.
46. Simplic. In Arist. Categ.: Simplicius. Commentaire sur les Catégories. 1990. / Hadot I. (ed.). Fasc. 1. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
47. Smith A. 1974. Porphyry's Place in the Neoplatonic Tradition: A Study in Post-Plotininn Neoplatonism. The Hague: MartinusNiihoff.
48. Speyer W. 1977. Der Ursprung warmer Quellen nach heidnischer und christlicherDeutung // Jahrbuch fiir Antike und Christentum 20, 39-46.
49. Stob. Ecl. I: Ioannis Stobaei anthologii libri duo priores qui inscribi solent Eclogae physicae et ethicae. 1884. Vol. I. Berlin: Weidmann.
50. Stob. Ecl. II: Ioannis Stobaei anthologii libri duo priores qui inscribi solent Eclogae physicae et ethicae. 1894. Vol. II. Berlin: Weidmann.
51. Stob. Ecl. III: Ioannis Stobaei anthologii libri duo priores qui inscribi solent Eclogae physicae et ethicae. 1912. Vol. III. Berlin: Weidmann.
52. Stob. Ecl. IV: Ioannis Stobaei anthologii libri duo priores qui inscribi solent Eclogae physicae et ethicae. 1923. Vol. IV. Berlin: Weidmann.
53. Syrian. Comm. In Herm.: Syriani in Hermogenem commentaria. 1892. / Rabe H. (ed.). Vol. I. Verlin: B.G. Teubner.
54. Syrian. Comm. In Herm.: Syriani in Hermogenem commentaria. 1893. / Rabe H. (ed.). Vol. II. Verlin: B.G. Teubner.
55. Vanderspoel J. 1988b. Themistios and the Origin of Iamblichos // Hermes 116, 125-128.
56. Vanderspoel J. 1988a. Iamblichus at Daphne // Greek, Roman, and Byzantim Studies 29, 83-86.
57. Vit. Is.: Damascius. The Pholosophical History. 1999. / Athanassiadi P. (ed.). Apameia: The Apamea Cultural Association.
58. Vita Isid., Epit. Phot.: Damascii Vitae Isidori Reliquiae. 1967. / Zintzen C. (ed.). Olms: Hildesheim.
59. VS (Eunap. VS): Eunapius. Eunapii vitae sophistarum. 1956. / Giangrande J. (ed.). Rome: Polygraphica.
60. Wallis R. T. 972. Neoplatonism. N.Y.: CUP.
61. Watts E. 2006. City and School in Late Antique Athens and Alexandria. Berkeley: UCP.
62. Westerink L. G. 1976-1977. The Greek Commentaries on Plato's Phaedo. L.: SS.
63. Westerink L.1959. Damascius. Lectures on the Philebus. Amsterdam: PS.
64. Wilson John F. 2004. Caesaria Philippi: Banias, The Lost City of Pan. L.; N.Y.: SS.
65. Zos.: Zosim. Novaya istoriya. 2010. / Bolgov N.N. (per.). Belgorod: BelGU.
66. Zoumpos A. N. 1956. Amelius von Etrurien. Sein Leben und seine Philosophie. Beitrag zur Geschichte des Neuplatonismus.Athenai: Clio.
