The problem of ethnocultural identity as a person’s idea of oneself, formed when a person realizes one’s own involvement in a particular ethnic group according to certain parameters of ethnogenesis: racial-biological (ancestral roots), climatic-geographical (historical territory) and sociocultural (the history of one’s people, ethnic symbols of culture and religion, etc.) – is directly related to the problem of studying cultural and historical features of individual countries and regions development in the context of a civilizational approach. The purpose of this work is a theoretical analysis of the civilizational approach, the possibility of its application in the study of the problem of young people’s ethnocultural identity formation based on folk traditions, customs and rituals. The source of the material was articles published in periodicals (Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power, Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, European Journal of Social Theory, etc., as well as publications of famous researchers (Vengerov A.B., Kornetov G.B., Panarin A.S., Toynbee A.J., Spengler, O., Huntington S.P., etc.). The following general scientific research methods are used to achieve the goal: analysis of scientific sources and synthesis of various theories and concepts on the research problem, their comparison, generalization of research results, identification of features of the civilizational approach in terms of studying possible ways of ethnocultural identity formation were used. The application of dialectical analysis of the designated problem allowed the authors to study ethnocultural identity phenomenon in the universal interrelation of philosophical, sociological and pedagogical sciences, to identify patterns and trends inherent in the process of ethnocultural identity formation, which combined all the versatile aspects into a single integrity and revealed on the basis of this a general holistic picture of the process of ethnocultural identity formation. Possible directions in the work on this phenomenon formation are identified: reliance on mankind’s cumulative experience, on the achievements of all sciences and culture in general; the study of ethnoculture and all its structural elements; the study of the world historical and pedagogical process in the center of which is a person who masters the culture created by previous generations and transforms this culture and oneself in the course of this development. The significance of the obtained results is that the civilizational approach allows, firstly, to carry out a retrospective analysis of the problem of young people’s ethnocultural identity formation based on folk traditions, customs and rituals in the context of the dynamics of the past, present and future; secondly, to justify the need to form young people’s ethnocultural identity formation based on folk traditions, customs and rituals as one of the significant components in the system of individual’s self-image; thirdly, to substantiate the possibility of using ethnoculture, the core of which are traditions, customs and rituals as the basic values of each nation, in the process of young people’s ethnocultural identity formation in modern sociocultural conditions.
civilizacionnyy podhod, formirovanie etnokul'turnoy identichnosti molodezhi, narodnye tradicii, obychai i obryady, filosofiya, sociologiya i pedagogika
1. Aberkrombi N., Hill S., Terner B.S. Sociologicheskiy slovar'. Per. s angl. I.G. Yasaveeva. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Moskva: Ekonomika, 2004. 619 s.
2. Antonsich M., Petrillo E.R. Ethnocultural diversity and the limits of the inclusive nation // Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power. 2019. 26, 6. 706-724.
3. Apollonov I.A, Tarba, I.D. The Problem of the Grounds of Ethno-Cultural Identity in the Context of Globalization // Problems of Philosophy. 2017. № 8. P. 30-42.
4. Arnason J. The Cultural Turn and the Civilizational Approach // European Journal of Social Theory. 2010. 13(1). 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431009355866
5. Belozercev E.P. Sobornost' kak put' k novoy shkole // Russkaya shkola. Sozdatelyam russkoy nacional'noy shkoly. Vypusk I. M.: Roman-gazeta, 1993. S. 10-28.
6. Boguslavskiy M.V. Modernizaciya rossiyskogo obrazovaniya: problemy i resheniya. Moskva: Minobrazovaniya Minoborony, 2004. 96 s.
7. Bondarevskaya E.V. Poisk putey vozrozhdeniya rossiyskoy duhovnosti i nravstvennosti v kontekste integracionnogo podhoda // Sibirskiy uchitel'. 2011. № 3(76). S. 26-32
8. Chernyak E.B. Civilografiya: nauka o civilizacii. Moskva: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1996. 381 s.
9. Çilkoparan H. Civilization as an Alternative Unit of Analysis in International Relations // E-International Relations. 2021. https://clck.ru/36pxwu
10. Sravnitel'noe izuchenie civilizaciy: hrestomatiya: uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vuzov / Sost., red. i vstup. st. B.S. Erasov. M.: Aspekt Press, 1998. 556 s.
11. Danilevsky N.Ya. Russia and Europe: a Look at the Cultural and Political Relations of the Slavic World to the Germanic-Romance. Moscow: Eksmo, 2003. 640 p.
12. Danilov M.A., Boldyrev N.I., Gurova R.G., Vorob'ev G.V. Problemy metodologii pedagogiki i metodov issledovaniya. Moskva: Pedagogika, 1971. 349 s.
13. Danilova T. Hoian I. Culture as a Living Organism: Some Words on Danilevsky’s Theory of Cultural-Historical Types // Path of Science. 2019. 5(10): 2001-2005. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.51-1
14. Dneprov E.D. Rossiyskoe obrazovanie v XIX – nachale XX veka. (v 2 t.). Stanovlenie i razvitie sistemy rossiyskogo obrazovaniya (istoriko-statisticheskiy analiz). M.: Marios, 2011. T. 2. 672 s.
15. Dzhurinskiy A.N. Pedagogika i obrazovanie v Rossii i v mire na poroge dvuh tysyacheletiy: sravnitel'no-istoricheskiy kontekst. Moskva: Prometey, 2011. 152 s.
16. Eng S.Tram J. The Influence of Family and Community Factors on Ethnic Identity // Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development. 2021. 49. 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12204
17. Osnovy filosofii. M.: Gumanit. izd centr VLADOS, 1997. 320 s
18. Obschie osnovy pedagogiki / Akad. ped. nauk SSSR. In-t teorii i istorii pedagogiki. Moskva: Prosveschenie, 1967. 391 s.
19. Gorelova I.N., Lysenko N.N., Muhlynkina Yu.V. Kul'tura i mezhkul'turnoe vzaimodeystvie. Moskva: RUT (MIIT), 2018. 126 s.
20. Granin Yu.D. Civilizational approach. Formation and evolution // Intelros Magazine Club ‘Problems of civilizational development’. 2021. № 2. P. 66-84.
21. Huntington S.P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. 1996.
22. Igosheva M.A., Paliy I.G., Krolman M.L., Takhtamyshev V.G. Ethnic Identity as a Cultural Safety Resource of Local Communities in the Context of Globalization // Journal of History Culture and Art Research. 2019. Vol. 8. № 3. P. 277. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i3.2249
23. Kanke V.A. Filosofiya. M.; Logos, 1996. 400 s.
24. Kapterev P.F. Izbrannye pedagogicheskie sochineniya. M.: Pedagogika, 1982. 703 s.
25. Kohanovskiy V.P. Filosofiya: uchebnoe posobie dlya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Rostov n/D: «Feniks», 2003. 576 s.
26. Kolomyts D.M., Kolomyts O.G. Civilizational approach in the study of history and culture: Eurasian vision // Modern science: actual problems of theory and practice. Series: Cognition. 2021. №12. P. 20-24. https://doi.org/10.37882/2500-3682.2021.12.14
27. Komarovskaya E.P., Vas'kov I.E. Civilizacionnyy podhod v istoriko-pedagogicheskom issledovanii problem vysshey shkoly // Vestnike VGU. Seriya: Problemy vysshego obrazovaniya. 2021. № 3. S. 38-41.
28. Kornetov G.B. Civilizacionnyy podhod kak metod istoriko-pedagogicheskogo issledovaniya aksiologicheskih problem obrazovaniya // Obrazovanie: idealy i cennosti (istoriko-teoreticheskiy aspekt). M., 1995. S. 68-83.
29. Kuz'mina N.V. Metody issledovaniya obrazovatel'nyh sistem. SPb.: Centr strategicheskih issledovaniy, 2018. 161 s.
30. Leont'ev K.N. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 12 tomah. SPb.: Vladimir Dal', 2001. 688 s.
31. Panarin A.S. Rossiya v civilizacionnom processe (mezhdu atlantizmom i evraziystvom). M., 1994. 262 s.
32. Pedagogicheskaya antropologiya: uchebnoe posobie. Moskva: Izd-vo URAO, 1998. 576 s.
33. Polyakov A.N. Civilization as a Social System: Theory, Typology and Method // Questions of History. 2007. № 11. P. 52-64.
34. Pozdnyakov E.A. Formational or civilizational approaches // World Economy and International Relations. 1990. № 5. P. 49-60.
35. Rapatskaya L.A. Civilizational approach in the pedagogy of music education: methodological foundations and prospects of development // Musical Art and Education. 2021 Vol. 9 No. 4. 9-28. https://doi.org/10.31862/2309-1428-2021-9-4-9-28
36. Rozin M.D., Khalil M.J. Al-Hirz, Svechkarev V.P., Ozerov A.A. Cognitive Analysis of Civilizational Clashes and Dialogues // European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS. 2021. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.09.02.299. ICEST 2021.II International Conference on Economic and Social Trends for Sustainability of Modern Society. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.09.02.299
37. Smirnov I.N., Titov V.F. Filosofiya: uchebnik dlya studentov vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. M.: 1998. 288 s.
38. Spengler O. The Decline of Europe: in 2 volumes. Moscow : Iris-press, 2004. Vol. 1. 528 p.
39. Spengler, O. The Decline of Europe: in 2 volumes. Moscow: Iris-press, 2004. Vol. 2. 624 p.
40. Stoiko O.A. Heuristic potential of civilizational methodology in the sociological study of the legal culture of Russians. 2021. https://clck.ru/36pxxz
41. Takhokhov B.A. Development of students’ ethnocultural competence in the context of globalization // Science for Education Today. 2019. Vol. 9. № 4. P. 73-92. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1904.05
42. Targowski A. The Civilization Approach to Education in the 21st Century // Comparative Civilizations Review. 2011. Vol. 65. № 65, Article 9. R. 73-104. https://clck.ru/36pxzg
43. Toynbee, A.J. Comprehension of history. Moscow: Iris-press, 2006. 640 p.
44. Ushinskiy K.D. Chelovek kak sub'ekt obrazovaniya: opyt pedagogicheskoy antropologii. Moskva: Feyr-Press, 2004. 574 s.
45. Vengerov A.B. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. M.: Omega-L, 2000. 528 s.
46. Vershinina N.A. Struktura pedagogiki: Metodika issledovaniya. Monografiya. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Lema», 2008. 313 s.
47. Vlasova, L.A. Russia and Europe in the context of a civilizational approach to history in the historiosophy of N.Y. Danilevsky and K.N. Leontiev (social and axiological aspects) // Context and reflection: philosophy about the world and man. 2018. Vol. 7. № 1A. P. 76-85.
48. Volkov Yu.G., Mostovaya I.V. Sociologiya: uchebnik dlya vuzov. M.: Gardarika, 1998. 244 s.
49. Vayner N.G. Stanovlenie i razvitie civilizacionnogo podhoda v istorii otechestvennoy pedagogiki XX veka: dissertaciya ... kan. ped. nauk: 13.00.01. Vladimir, 2008. 209 s.
50. Willfried, Spohn. World history, civilizational analysis and historical sociology: Interpretations of non-Western civilizations in the work of Johann Arnason // European Journal of Social Theory. 2011. 14(1). R. 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431010394506
51. Yakovets Yu.V., Soluttsev E.E. System of Long-term Goals of Sustainable Development of Civilizations. Moscow: Institute of Economic Strategies, 2017. 376 p.
52. Zhukovsky D.A. Civilizational approach in political science: features of formation in the conditions of a new social reality. 2022. https://clck.ru/36py5y
